Proofreading Services Retired
We’ve officially closed our proofreading services. You can probably guess why. With AI tools like ChatGPT now doing the job for free (and instantly), the demand for human proofreaders has all but vanished. If you still prefer a human touch, you're part of a rare—and shrinking—breed. We're now back to our roots: a forum for nitpicking the finer points of the English language. Thanks for your past support. We appreciate it.
Submit your question here.
Latest Posts
I am working on a documentary film and have hit upon a conundrum that we hope one of the fabulous Pain in the English grammarians can solve. We are using the full capital case (”all caps”) to identify our experts, in a text box that pops up below them during their appearances on screen; for example: JOHN SMITH, HISTORIAN. One of our experts has a name that includes a superscript letter (e.g.: JANE MCDONALD) and another has the abbreviation Jr. after his name (e.g.: WILLIAM DOE, JR.).
Question: Should those superscripted and abbreviated letters stay in all caps, too? Or should they be treated differently, either lower case or small caps? (e.g.: JANE McDONALD / WILLIAM DOE, Jr.) I’ve searched the Chicago Manual of Style and the Government Printing Office’s online manual, and have found no guidance in either.
Thank you for your help!
Susan
I have an issue with the use of the past perfect tense with “until” (and sometimes “before”). Can you please tell me which of these sentences is correct and why?
She hadn’t realized that she was addicted to nicotine until she smoked ten cigarettes a day. (i.e.: Before she smoked that many cigarettes, she didn’t have that knowledge about herself - not realizing/knowing was earlier.)
or
She didn’t realize that she was addicted to nicotine until she had smoked ten cigarettes a day. (i.e.: First she smoked that many cigarettes, and then she realized.)
I cringe whenever I hear the way Brits say: ‘the company ‘are’ or ‘the school board ‘are’ voted in by the parents. What is really frightening to me is that Americans are starting to use the same construction. My research tells me that Brits treat collective nouns as plural, while in the USA we consider them singular. ‘School Board’ is singular. ‘School Boards’ is plural.
I was taught that one should never use double negatives. But I was also taught that if you do, it can have the opposite meaning.
Example: The box does not contain nothing.
means: The box contains something.
So I heard the President’s speech. Note that he was not the first person to say it because I have also heard several newsmen use a similar expression. When I heard it, it sounded wrong. But I could NOT put my finger on why it sounded wrong. Then suddenly it occurred to me, a double negative!
So here is what I heard...
“Putin badly miscalculated.” or
“He badly miscalculated.”
Since bad is the negative of good and the prefix “mis” makes calculated negative, isn’t this a double negative? I know what they mean. Shouldn’t this sentence be written like so?
“He severely miscalculated.”
Since severe is neither negative nor positive. It just indicates the degree of something.
I wrote, “I have two sons, Bill and Ben.”
An editor said that the comma should be a colon. That opinion is backed up by various style guides which say a list (and presumably “Bill and Ben” is a list) should be preceded by a colon. I still feel that a colon is unnecessary, though I probably would use a colon if I had five sons not two. Would I use a colon with three sons? I’m not sure.
Had I written, “I have two sons, Bill and Ben, both in their twenties” there would surely be no question of a colon being required. It seems odd to me that omitting the final phrase, “both in their twenties” forces the first comma to become a colon.
I would be interested in others’ views.
I was reading an old novel, British English written around 1850. I came across the phrase “I saw signs of elephant in the forest”. This intrigued me as the word "elephant" implies anything from a single to multiple animals. The word "signs" seems to have taken on the role of plurality for the noun. I was asked a similar question by my partner who is editing a book in which the phrase “I saw fairy dancing in the woods,” not meaning a single fairy but many fairies dancing. Can anyone expand my knowledge on the use of a singular noun being used as a non-collective plural noun?
I am a bit confused about whether or not I should use “the” before “most” in the following sentence. I have searched on the internet but I have before more confused about the issue so please help me in this regard. I will add this sentence to my formal writing.
The sentence:
"What fascinates me the most about the textile industry is that it drives the economy of many third world countries”
or
"What fascinates me most about the textile industry is that it drives the economy of many third world countries”
Which one is correct and why?
Hi everybody! Few days ago my mate attended to a job competition for a job in the technical office of Rome. Among the many legal questions there were also some English questions. The one I am asking your help for is:
“Let ……. come in.”
the possible answers proposed are:
- his
- him
- he
I am sure that all of you are thinking that the only right option to chose is “him”, that’s it.
Initially it was confirmed “his” with correct answer and after few days was corrected with “him”.
The english questions/phrases put in these competitions are generally extracted form bigger pieces, books.. and my partner didn’t answer because he says that in a certain contests it can be also right “Let his come in”, for example:
Michele is waiting for the vet to visit his cat. When the vet wants to visit Michele’s cat can say to his secretary:
<< Let his come in >> instead of << Let his cat come in>>.
What do you think? Is it possible consider both the options “his” and “him” correct?
Have you read some examples in books or articles in which you have found the phrase “Let his come in” ?
It can help my partner to obtain the job because he got a score of 20.8 and he had to get 21 to obtain the job! So it is very important the help of all of you.
Thanks !!!!!!!!!
Sells or Sold?
Does ‘sells’ in the sentence,”I find a pet store that sells ferrets.” stay as ‘sells’ or change to ‘sold’ if you are changing the sentence to Simple Past Tense?
Which of the follow is correct?
- CAYA stands for “come as you are.”
- “CAYA” stands for “come as you are.”
I am not referring to the Nirvana song, so I assume that capitalization is not necessary when spelling out what the initialism stands for.
Latest Comments
Why Asian English Speakers Are Hard to Understand
- ArianaEmery
- August 27, 2026, 9:18am
Discover stylish Halloween outfits for women that make dressing up fun, effortless, and memorable. From spooky classics to trendy character looks, there is something for every personality. Explore creative halloween costume outfits designed for parties, events, and themed celebrations, helping you stand out while feeling comfortable, confident, and festive all night.
Treatment of abbreviations and superscript items in full capital case
- Ramcoolers
- August 21, 2026, 5:29am
Interesting discussion on handling abbreviations and superscript letters in all caps text. The focus on consistency and readability is especially useful for designers working on professional video graphics and captions.
a href="https://clickzap.in/ai-marketing-automation-services-in-hyderabad-a-complete-guide-for-businesses-in-2026///">AI marketing automation services in Hyderabad
Past perfect with until
- Ramcoolers
- August 19, 2026, 10:16am
Interesting and informative read! I enjoyed how the topic is explained with clear examples and practical language insights. A useful resource for anyone interested in improving their English.
thus, therefore and hence are different
- Rodney Zaxx
- August 7, 2026, 6:59pm
No - you arrange things thus. "Thus" describes the resulting arrangement (a noun, modified by an adjective), not the method of arranging (using boxes and a handcart? Just your hands?). It's like "I feel bad" - "bad" describes the feeling (an emotion, a noun) - vs. "I feel badly", which just means that you're bad at feeling.
Good explanation of the difference among those three words. Thanks!
"badly miscalculated" — double negatives?
- tetrisgameaz
- June 18, 2026, 7:23am
Debating nuanced grammar rules and independently dissecting a complex linguistic structure layout completely on your own initiative is fantastic for writers. Evaluating correct word usage and tracking analytical semantic assets entirely on your own merit reminds me of the strict, strategic focus needed to solve puzzles in advanced 1 player Games online. A highly intellectual discussion thread!
Might could
- Ava4wolves
- June 8, 2026, 11:34pm
Would that I could standardize all rules of spoken English, yet most assuredly 14% of Americans would ax that I not do so.
“my” vs. “mine” in multiple owner possessive
- firesafetysystems
- March 2, 2026, 4:22pm
This piece is clearly written and simple to understand. The examples provided really helped clarify the key points and made the overall message much more impactful. Great job!
“my” vs. “mine” in multiple owner possessive
- firesafetysystems
- March 2, 2026, 4:21pm
I so appreciate you Gregg’s child and mine to school today.
“my” vs. “mine” in multiple owner possessive
- online chess trainer
- February 20, 2026, 5:43am
Pain in the English is a community-run English grammar and usage forum that dives into the fine details and grey areas of English language questions. The specific page you linked shows a detailed discussion about using “my” vs. “mine” in a sentence, with many comments explaining the grammatical reasoning. It's a useful resource for enthusiasts of English grammar, but since it’s a discussion forum rather than an official style guide, opinions and answers may vary in authority
online chess training



“my” vs. “mine” in multiple owner possessive
I think “my” is correct when it comes directly before a noun, while “mine” works when the noun is already understood. In this example, “Gregg’s and my child” sounds much more natural than “mine and Gregg’s child.” The discussion also shows how grammar and natural usage can sometimes be slightly different.