As it were

Isn't it the subjunctive? Isn't it saying proposing a condition contrary to fact?

3 votes Vote!  •  URL to this comment  •  Report Abuse

Wonderful Drew - there are at least two of us who remember the subjunctive!

1 vote Vote!  •  URL to this comment  •  Report Abuse

If I were a bit quicker off the mark, I'd have posted the same comment...

1 vote Vote!  •  URL to this comment  •  Report Abuse

Gosh - it'll be gerunds next!!

1 vote Vote!  •  URL to this comment  •  Report Abuse

True. That is subjunctive. I not a native English speaker. I learn English such that I know grammar.. Subjective is one of the most difficult parts of English to many non-native students....

1 vote Vote!  •  URL to this comment  •  Report Abuse

This phrase is one of the cases where "were" is still required in the third person singular. In other counterfactual statements, we can use either "was" or "were", for instance
I wish I were/was going with you.
If I were/was stronger...

"were" is also required when it is inverted:
Were I stronger...
*Was I stronger...

And also when followed by another verb:
If I were to go...
?If I was to go...

3 votes Vote!  •  URL to this comment  •  Report Abuse

"As" is a rare lead-in of the subjunctive. We are more used to the "if".

As though I were an authority on grammar, I post the above.
As it were, I suppose I could be.

1 vote Vote!  •  URL to this comment  •  Report Abuse

This case is one of Subjunctive Mood. When you use the subjunctive, you are referring to something that factually is not the case – as in "wish."

(My non-technical answer.)

1 vote Vote!  •  URL to this comment  •  Report Abuse

The subjunctive is indeed incorporated into this expression. However, I'd suggest you treat this as a particular idiom along the lines of "so to speak."

0 vote Vote!  •  URL to this comment  •  Report Abuse

Long live the subjunctive! ;)

2 votes Vote!  •  URL to this comment  •  Report Abuse

Drew and semiotek, I know it too. I'm used to "if", "though", "though" without "as", "wish", and even "as" itself leading the subjunctive.

0 vote Vote!  •  URL to this comment  •  Report Abuse

This one bothers me, too. I find the phrase "as it were" to almost always sound stilted, but then again, I am also bothered by "an historic".

0 vote Vote!  •  URL to this comment  •  Report Abuse

'an historic' is probably stilted if 'historic' is actually pronounced with [h]. And maybe even sometimes if it isn't.

Some speakers have it naturally, though, with [h]-deletion conditioned by stress.

If stress is on the first syllable, [h] is pronounced, and 'a' thus appears as the article:

a history book

If stress is not on the first syllable, [h] deletes, and 'an' is selected:

an {h}istoric occasion
an {h}istorical novel

1 vote Vote!  •  URL to this comment  •  Report Abuse

I say "an historic", but I don't pronounce the "h". "As it were" is subjunctive. If you knew grammar, though, you wouldn't ask such stupid questions.

0 vote Vote!  •  URL to this comment  •  Report Abuse

In my own humble opinion, which could be wrong...

If you mean something like "so to speak," you use, "as it were". E.g. No rest for the wicked, as it were.

But if you mean like "something in the past", then you say "as it was". E.g. Life, as it was. or School life, as it was.

1 vote Vote!  •  URL to this comment  •  Report Abuse

I wish I were an Oscar Meyer weiner.

1 vote Vote!  •  URL to this comment  •  Report Abuse

Yip dip lip pip chip, as it were, don't ya know, I said, so to speak.

1 vote Vote!  •  URL to this comment  •  Report Abuse