Discussion Forum
This is a forum to discuss the gray areas of the English language for which you would not find answers easily in dictionaries or other reference books.
Do You Have a Question?
Latest Posts : Etymology / History
I had never thought I would ever wonder what “width” is until my 12-year old daughter came home one day and told me that her math teachers (not just one but two) told her that “width” in geometry is the vertical side of a rectangle. That to me was like saying up is down and down is up. How could this be?
It turns out that her teachers are not alone. Take a look at this page I came across while Googling on the topic. It says:
In the case of a square or a rectangle, the expression length (1) is commonly used instead of base and width (w) instead of height. In the case of a circle the expression diametre (d) is used.
“Width instead of height” is very much like saying up is down. Where did this come from?
And, what is even more disconcerting is that the teachers are not aware of this ambiguous nature of “width.” Two other teachers told me that width is always the horizontal side, and another told me that she has heard others call the vertical side “width.” So, apparently, each is teaching their students in an authoritative manner their own definition of “width.” If a 12-year old is told by her math teacher that “width” in geometry refers to the vertical side, why should she doubt it? Unless, of course, she was also told that “width” can be vertical or horizontal (i.e. direction neutral, like “length”). But that is apparently not what is happening at school in New York City.
If we teach our kids that a triangle has three sides, we don’t want them thinking that the definition of “triangle” could be flexible as if it could have four or five sides. If the definition of “width” is not universal, they need to know that. Here is a case in point. The following question was in 2016 Common Core Math Test for Grade 6.
“A carpenter built three bookcases, A, B, and C, to stand next to each other along a wall. The total length of the wall is 456 centimeters. The carpenter will build two more bookcases, D and E, along the same wall. These two bookcases will have equal widths. The widths of bookcases A, B, and C are shown in the table blow.”
Now, if you were taught that in geometry, “width” means the vertical side and “length” means the horizontal side, you would have to be confused reading this question. The correct response would be, “But why should the ‘widths’ of the bookcases have anything to do with the ‘length’ of the wall in fitting the bookcases?”
My daughter tried to figure this out by drawing a bunch of bookshelves with different heights, and eventually gave up because the question made no sense to her.
In Merriam-Webster, the word “width” has no ambiguity: “the horizontal measurement taken at right angles to the length.” After all, the word “height” has no ambiguity, so why should we think “width” would?
But looking at the Oxford dictionary gives us a slightly different answer: “The measurement or extent of something from side to side; the lesser of two or the least of three dimensions of a body.”
In other words, in a rectangle, “the lesser of the two” sides would be called “width” regardless of the orientation. So, it appears that this is an American-versus-British issue, or is it? (Note the spelling of “diametre” on the page from fao.org quoted above.)
I have searched the forum and not found any reference to this matter. More and more, I’m hearing this kind of construction: “The fact of the matter is is that we need to...” or “The biggest problem is is that we don’t have...” I’ve even heard President Obama use it. At first blush, it bothers me. There’s no need for the second “is,” and no grammatical precedent. That is to say, I don’t know what it might spill over from. Furthermore, it seems like a fairly recent arrival. What do you think? Is this something we should eschew or embrace? Has anyone else heard and taken note of this?
What is the origin of the phrase “I’m just saying”?
Can anyone tell me when and how the adding of “ish” to the end of words got started? Do we lack such confidence in ourselves that we need to add “ish” like a disclaimer to our own words? When has the word become not word enough?
When did “issue” come to mean “problem” ?
When an why did “exactly the same” become “the exact same” and more recently “the same exact”?
There exists a claim that the word “man” originally only referred to people of unimplied sex. To restate, “man” always refereed to both male and female people.
The claims I found were made by sources known by some to be categorically highly unreliable, so I turn to you.
There are claims that “wer” or “were” was used at least for adult males.
The most reliable sources I’ve found to support that are
http://www.collinsdictionary.com/...
What evidence can you provide of the use of “were” or “wer” in english and the use of “man” and whether “man” changed over time with respect to gender or whether there was always ambiguity?
I just have the impression that the old proverbs that I heard as a child aren’t heard as much today. People just don’t seem to use them much anymore.
Of course this is hard to prove: maybe I am not mixing in the right circles; maybe there are newer proverbs that have replaced the older (proverbs change with each generation); maybe the media and/or gurus have picked up some and ignored others; maybe few make into print outside the tabloids and popular magazines.
As far as the printed word goes, of those I have looked at some seem to peak around the 1930′s and then trail off, only to recover somewhat over the last decade or two. “Actions speak louder than words” was the commonest one I found, 3:1 against “Beggars can not be choosers”.
What is your impression? Is proverb use declining or just new ones becoming popular?
More and more lately I’ve been hearing and seeing a change in the prepositions used in common phrases.
I’ve already commented on PITE about the use of “deal to” instead of “deal with” in NZ, and of course we have the age old debate about “different from/to”.
Recently I noticed some others creeping in:-
“what do you make to....” instead of “what do you make make of .....”
“I have no intention on.......” instead of “I have no intention of......”.
I’m sure there are others.
While there may be nothing grammatically wrong in this, it does sound a little strange and raises the question of why and how such usage arises.
Does it stem from a desire to be different just for the sake of being different?
Is it down to some kind of narcissism?
. when saying “what reading
Will words like fæces, archæologist, fœtus disappear from our language or should they be preserved?
Latest Comments
It’s Official: email not e-mail
- user115383
- September 24, 2023, 1:05am
owch
It’s Official: email not e-mail
- user115383
- September 24, 2023, 1:04am
pain in my a
“enamored with” and “enamored by”
- user113977
- September 16, 2023, 12:42am
I think your thinking is correct, hehe, but I think it all depends on how you frame the subject, or thing, or person, that you are enamored with. To be enamored of something could be the same as being enamored by something. For example, ‘I was enamored with her when I caught my first glimpse.’ Or, ‘I was enamored by her striking good looks when I first laid eyes on her.’ Proper noun versus fake noun (a noun you can’t touch, lol, like an idea), maybe…? I don’t know, I suck at English my first language but all the other non-backwards languages make sense to me and I excel at those. At those, does not seem correct…excel at that, excel at those… this is what I’m talking about, makes no fk’n sense to me…
“my” vs. “mine” in multiple owner possessive
- user113318
- September 11, 2023, 6:31am
“my” vs. “mine” in multiple owner possessive
- user113318
- September 11, 2023, 6:29am
"Amazing blog post. Thank you for sharing this information. We'd like to introduce you to our online Cisco certification courses you can learn online with UniNets and for Cisco exams and job roles. For more details, you can visit our website.
SD-WAN TRAINING
Past perfect with until
- nathanbryan
- September 5, 2023, 9:59pm
. In the healthcare industry, nurses can additionally foster their leadership limits by participating in interdisciplinary gatherings. These gatherings give chances to share [interdisciplinary plan proposal capella](https://onlineclassservices.com/nurs-fpx-4010-assessment-3-attempt-1-interdisciplinary-plan-proposal/) dominance and make solid relationship with others.
Past perfect with until
- nathanbryan
- September 5, 2023, 9:55pm
The [care coordination presentation to colleagues](https://onlineclassservices.com/nurs-fpx-4050-assessment-3-care-coordination-presentation-to-colleagues-2/) is a site that can assist understudies with their undertakings. For any circumstance, its outcomes have been blended and it doesn't give limits or attestations to counterfeiting revultion. Ace my homework is a help that offers writing help. It maintains to give papers that are copyright infringement unendingly liberated from messes up. For any situation, there are various backings for why this help major areas of strength for isn't such way.
Past perfect with until
- nathanbryan
- September 5, 2023, 9:55pm
The care coordination presentation to colleagues is a site that can assist understudies with their undertakings. For any circumstance, its outcomes have been blended and it doesn't give limits or attestations to counterfeiting revultion. Ace my homework is a help that offers writing help. It maintains to give papers that are copyright infringement unendingly liberated from messes up. For any situation, there are various backings for why this help major areas of strength for isn't such way.
“Defeat to”
- user112124
- August 31, 2023, 11:00pm
It has to be “defeated by” since the defeated party is the object. If you want to use “to” then it needs to be “lost to” because the losing party is the subject. Someone has mentioned “defeat against” but here the word “defeat” is a noun and not the past participle of a verb such as “defeated” so we would have something like “Manchester United suffered a defeat against Liverpool” which I think is OK, as would be the use of “by”.
“my” vs. “mine” in multiple owner possessive
Great post. I am dealing with many of these issues as well..
Web Designing Training in Bangalore
Web Designing Course in Bangalore
Web Development Training in Bangalore
Web Development Course in Bangalore
Front End Development Training in Bangalore
Front End Development Course in Bangalore
Python training in Bangalore
Python Course in Bangalore
React JS Training in Bangalore
React JS Course in Bangalore