Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

Pain in the English offers proofreading services for short-form writing such as press releases, job applications, or marketing copy. 24 hour turnaround. Learn More

Hairy Scot

Joined: January 31, 2011
Comments posted: 557
Votes received: 404

Expat Scot now living in NZ. Home town was Greenock. Achieved SCE(H) levels in a number of subjects. Was employed by a multi-national company so spent a fair bit of time in other parts of Europe. Moved to South Africa in 1981 and then to NZ in 2007.

Questions Submitted

Indirect Speech?

June 15, 2016

“Defeat to”

November 2, 2015

“Thanks for that”

January 7, 2015

“Rack” or “Wrack”?

January 2, 2015

3 Laning?

December 8, 2014

“Watching on”?

November 23, 2014

Alternate Prepositions?

April 27, 2014

Mentee?

April 7, 2014

“admits to”

March 11, 2014

Pronunciation of “gill”

January 20, 2014

“You have two choices”

December 9, 2013

Selfie

November 23, 2013

Horizontal Stripes?

November 6, 2013

in that regard

October 12, 2013

“deal to”

February 27, 2013

Preferred forms

January 1, 2013

intend on doing?

December 29, 2012

“in regards to”

October 17, 2012

“it caught on fire”

October 16, 2012

“Liquid water”?

October 12, 2012

“get in contact”

July 11, 2012

“As per ....”?

May 12, 2012

-age words

March 11, 2012

Perpendicular

November 29, 2011

Stood down

August 1, 2011

Signage

February 8, 2011

Recent Comments

@Ralph Malph

"I have gotten...."??

No thanks!

Hairy Scot December 3, 2016, 9:06pm

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

An acronym is a pronounceable word made up of a series of initial letters or parts of words the possessive, or the plural possessive is handled in exactly the same way as it is for all words which end in S.
I would assume that the same hold true for the possessive plural of a set of initials.
eg: RADARs range, PDFs' size

Hairy Scot October 23, 2016, 6:17pm

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

@jtu
That was a somewhat petulant and insulting post.
I am certainly not trying issue you with any fiats or diktats, but merely pointing out that there are those of us whose views differ from yours.
You are of course entitled to your opinions, as am I.
I also like to question many things; among these are the way our language has been and is being bastardised and the laissez faire attitudes of those who consistently trumpet the dubious virtues of common usage.
As for my education being founded in a "Victorian" view; that premise is not even worthy of comment, let alone discussion.
I do not cling unquestioningly to any facet of the English language, but it does seem that there are those like yourself who are quite happy to see the language sullied in support of common usage.

Hairy Scot October 15, 2016, 10:33pm

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

@Riss

I believe that "cacography" has been mentioned on at least two occasions in this thread.

Hairy Scot October 12, 2016, 5:36pm

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

"ATM machine"?

Nice tautology there.

Hairy Scot October 7, 2016, 4:50pm

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

@jtu
I rest my case.

Hairy Scot September 25, 2016, 11:16pm

1 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

@jtu
I just have one more question:
Do you, and those who share your thoughts on issues like this, believe that those of us who attended schools and universities prior to 1965 should forget all that we learned about the English language in that time and adopt the various fads and errors that have become commonplace since then?

Hairy Scot September 25, 2016, 7:53pm

1 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

@jtu
That is a typical descriptivist cop out.
Your use of "different to" illustrates that you are firmly in the camp of those who just like to be different for the sake of being different and who have absolutely no respect for the language.
No doubt you will soon be advocating the use of "should of" as a correct alternative to "should have" and that perpendicular just means at right angles with no regard to plane.
How do you stand on mixing up past tense and past participle?

Hairy Scot September 25, 2016, 6:02pm

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

@jtu
"@HS It's not just Jane Austen:
http://www.google.co.nz/search?q=%22the+family+...

Does that makes it correct?

Hairy Scot September 25, 2016, 7:24am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

@jtu
Are you saying that Jane Austen could not have been wrong?

You know, it really surprises me that people who are apparently reasonably well educated seek to gainsay what has been taught for decades in schools in the UK and elsewhere.
It's a bit like the old lady watching troops marching past and exclaiming, "They're all out of step bar our Willie".

Hairy Scot September 25, 2016, 2:34am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

@jtu
In answer to your two previous posts.
1.
Education
2.
Family is and always will be a collective noun.

Hairy Scot September 25, 2016, 12:27am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

@jayles the unwoven

There are nouns which are recognised as having only a plural form and as such are not relevant to a discussion on collective nouns.
These include police, cattle, oats, tweezers, pants, remains.

Hairy Scot September 24, 2016, 8:59pm

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

My apologies for the typo in my previous post.
I should of course have used plurality instead of pluralism.

Hairy Scot September 22, 2016, 7:29pm

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

@JonRich
With you 100% on this one.
However, I've no doubt the usual naysayers will present some spurious contrary arguments.

Hairy Scot September 22, 2016, 12:17am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

This keeps popping up, and there are those who will insist on using a plural verb for certain collective nouns.
IMHO a collective noun gets a singular verb. End of story.
Despite arguments to the contrary, "family" is a collective noun, and I don't care how many family members there might be, it therefore gets a singular verb.
Similarly team, government, IRS, etc etc are all collectives and get singular verbs.
No doubt Warsaw Will and Jayles will now climb in with contrary positions based on some spurious concept of pluralism.

Hairy Scot September 22, 2016, 12:14am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

I'd go with "Walking Heaven’s woods with her daddy."
I base that on my reading it as Heaven being singular and the woods being part of Heaven.

Hairy Scot September 22, 2016, 12:07am

7 votes    Permalink    Report Abuse

I don't think so.

Hairy Scot August 16, 2016, 7:18pm

6 votes    Permalink    Report Abuse

@jtu
I do not dispute that there is a place for both words.
I'd just prefer to see and hear them used properly.

Hairy Scot August 11, 2016, 9:11pm

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

Oops.
Forgive the superfluous "I" in my previous entry.
Finger trouble.

Hairy Scot August 9, 2016, 9:38pm

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse