Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files within 24 hours. We hate grammatical errors with passion. Learn More


wrong, incorrect, bad

I am currently teaching English in Spain and one of my students asked me a question that has left me dumbfounded. How would someone explain the differences between:


I know what sounds good, but I haven’t been able to find a hard and fast rule.

Submit Your Comment



Sort by  OldestLatestRating

Here's my early morning, pre-caffeinated take on it: If you reshuffle the terms a bit, you get a continuum of value judgments.

"Incorrect" suggests that something is simple not as it is supposed to be. It carries less of an opinionated or moral judgment than the others. So we can say that 1+1=3 is incorrect, but if you say that child slavery is incorrect it'll sound a bit weird.

"Wrong" can go either way - it can be a judgement of accuracy or of moral/ethical merit. Barcelona as the capital of Spain is wrong, and so is beating your wife. The word works both ways.

"Bad" has much more of a moral/ethical judgment to it. It's perfectly fine to say that Twinkies on pizza is bad, but to say it's incorrect sounds like there's a rule being broken which - to my dismay - there is not.

Whoops. Late for work. Bad.

mshades May 16, 2011, 10:01am

24 votes    Permalink    Report Abuse

I was all set to say the same thing as mshades; they're more or less a series of stops along a line of judgment from more objective to more opinion-based/emotional.

I would except in the case of spoiled food, because, if you say "the milk is bad," you don't mean you don't like milk. but that's context-specific and idiomatic. You can just say "spoiled" and duck the issue.

scyllacat May 16, 2011, 10:12am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

just tell them "incorrecto", "que está mal" or "malo" ;-) they will understand!

Anita May 16, 2011, 12:52pm

2 votes    Permalink    Report Abuse

By the way, I am a native Spanish speaker from Spain who also happens to teach English. I hope I didn't come off as condescending with my answer, I just know that when you get those inevitable "how-am-i-going-to-explain-this" ESL questions, sometimes you just better know the translation in their native language. If you don't, well, just give them lots of examples in different conexts and they will eventually understand. It sounds like a question from a lower level so no need to give too elaborated explanations because they will simply not understand. The above replies were excellent and instructive, by the way.

Anita May 16, 2011, 1:10pm

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

@ mshades - Thanks soooo much this is perfect!
@ Scyllacat - I will have to mention the milk example, he loves idiomatic expressions.
@ Anita- No worries, I will definitely use what you said above, though my student has a high level of English, it was more a clarification than anything because he is giving a speech soon and wants it to be perfect...well as perfect as possible with his Murcian accent.
Thanks again to all! I will be sure to use all of these on Friday.

Pam Kline May 17, 2011, 12:47am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

I must disagree with mshades, the thing is simpler than that.

There is no moral/ethical judgment when you say Bad/Good, something is bad when it hurts you in some way, and good when you get profit from it.
Right or Wrong depends only on your point of view or situation, and thats it, it can change at any time.
To be correct has to be better, faster or getting better results than other ways to do something, i.e. I do my job in 1 minute, my neighbour does it in 30 seconds, my procedure is incorrect at some point.

"I need more money, changing to a better job will give me more money, this is correct, my neighbour thinks it's wrong, cause I seem happy in my actual job, but cause it does not hurt me, it's not a bad idea."

Sharm May 24, 2011, 4:51am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

I disagree, Sharm. Please re-read mshades' post. "Right/Wrong" can cover both "Correct/Incorrect" (which imply factual accuracy, error or mistake) and "Bad/Good" (which imply harm/benefit and sometimes CAN imply moral/ethical judgment -- i.e., "Homosexuality is bad", or "Stealing is wrong").

mistress oubliette May 29, 2011, 9:36am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

msshade's post re-read...
Same opinion... I must be thinking latin way i guess...
Im not saying he/she is wrong or incorrect or that his/her opinion sounds bad, every single option depends on where you stand though, but I am sure every single one of them (right,wrong,incorrect..blablabla) has a meaning of its own, i just cant seem to find the exact point they deffer.

Sharm May 29, 2011, 2:19pm

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

What about thinking in terms of levels of "formality": Good/Bad is simplistic, Right/Wrong is familiar, and Correct/Incorrect is formal.

I must giggle, though, and your use of the term, "hard and fast rule" when discussing English... :o)

kerbe June 27, 2011, 7:12am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

When learning Spanish I always asked native speakers why things where said certain ways. For example, Obtener vs. Conseguir. They would always say "It just sounds right". I have stuck to that rule and used words that are commonly spoken. It really is unexplainable outside of just colloquial preference why certain words are used over others when they carry similar meanings. When in doubt imitate natives and use the common lexicon.

CamEdwardo June 30, 2011, 5:35pm

1 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

I feel that bad and good are religious-moral; and right and wrong are secular-moral. Right and wrong can also overlap with correct and incorrect. That's my english though.

Shan July 15, 2011, 9:24pm

1 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

Very good site.Thanks

Santha kumar May 10, 2013, 11:55am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

Yes     No