Double Words

I would imagine these are all mainly humorous.

Were you happy-happy, or were you just "happy" because you're expected to say so out of politeness?

Was it fixed-fixed, or was it just hardcoded or duct-taped to work for that one use case/scenario?

He’s in his office-office -- this could easily apply to my boss, who is a workaholic. Everywhere is his office, and then we have our real corporate office.

I can't say I see any need for saying "Do you know how to type type", unless most people they have encountered only know how to type with one finger and you're looking for someone who knows how to use all 10.

Thanks so much for your response. However, I was very serious about double words. I find the use of them to be lazy and an avoidance to one's vocabulary-building. The people that I hear using double words are not saying them jokingly or for humor. In other words, instead of asking "Were you elated?", they say, "Were you happy, or were you happy-happy?" I dislike such lazy speech and hope that it does not become acceptable. Besides, it is often quite confusing, such as, "Was he at the gym, or at the gym-gym?" Someone said that to me and I don't know what he or she meant, nor did I feel that I should have to check for clarification. Thanks for your input.

I hear people both in person and on television using the alleged word "I's." Is there such a word. For example, people might say, "John, Joe's, and I's baseball ticket got lost in the subway." To me, that is just wrong and there is not such word as I's. Am I right?

I think this use of double words is a necessary reaction to the blurring of literal and figurative uses of words. For example, many businesspersons have a 'mobile office' that consists of their smartphone and laptop. But they may also have a bricks-and-mortar office with a desk, chair, landline, and fellow office workers. How should one differentiate them? We can't really say that the latter is the 'real' office, as the mobile office performs its function in real ways and therefore wins the status of a 'real office'. A quick and unambiguous way is to call the latter the 'office office'.

The other examples given by Judith seem equally valid. Using duplication avoids having to use provocative or insulting expressions:
"happy or happy happy" = "genuinely happy or just faking it"; "fixed or fixed fixed" = "fixed the underlying cause or just kludged it";
"type or type type" = "type professionally or stumble along in an amateurish two-finger effort"

I don't think I'm going to use duplicate words in this way, but I think it's a legitimate addition to the language. It may not be English English but it is English.