Isn't the rule that you only leave off the s after the apostrophe if it comes after an s that you've added for some other reason (i.e. making it plural)?
Generally, yes, but here the confusion arose between the written S and the pronounced S sound at the end of X. It's a natural and common error and essentially shows that the person does actually care somewhat about doing things right. :)
GP (unregistered)
November 13, 2004, 9:41pm
Isn't the rule that you only leave off the s after the apostrophe if it comes after an s that you've added for some other reason (i.e. making it plural)?
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
speedwell2
November 15, 2004, 7:58am
Generally, yes, but here the confusion arose between the written S and the pronounced S sound at the end of X. It's a natural and common error and essentially shows that the person does actually care somewhat about doing things right. :)
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
passerby (unregistered)
November 16, 2004, 12:34pm
yes i agree with " Lux's" to show possesion
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
speedwell2
October 25, 2004, 8:14am
In this case, write "Lux's."
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
ryan (unregistered)
October 26, 2004, 10:17pm
I would say "Lux's" as well.
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
davidlrattigan
October 27, 2004, 1:29pm
Certainly LUX'S.
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
pirobizen
October 27, 2004, 9:49pm
"Lux's" sounds like a restaurant name!
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
speedwell2
October 28, 2004, 8:06am
Well, they are building a "Grand Lux Cafe" not too far from our corporate HQ in Houston.
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse