Your Pain Is Our Pleasure
24-Hour Proofreading Service—We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files. We hate grammatical errors with passion. Learn More
August 12, 2010
Total number of comments
Total number of votes received
"Hate with a passion" is more common:https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=hate+with+a+passion%2Chate+with+passion%2Chate+passionately%2Cpassionately+hate&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Chate%20with%20a%20passion%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Chate%20with%20passion%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Chate%20passionately%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cpassionately%20hate%3B%2Cc0
The trick at the end is to leave a space after the single quotation mark, separating it from the double.
Four and seventy-three thousandths per cent ??? (4.073%)
On google books "neither are to blame" shows up just nineteen times, whereas "neither is to blame" has over five thousand results.
" neither were significant predictors of the outcome measures""they were not working mischief, neither were they doing any great good; ""neither were most of their members prepared to take part as citizens.""Things are either what they appear to be: or they neither are, nor appear to be""And if the fountains are not gods, neither are the rivers,""Neither are we truly portraying what Christ's disciple means. "
Both are possible, depending on the context:
KING HENRYWe are in God’s hand, brother, not in theirs.March to the bridge. It now draws toward night.Beyond the river we’ll encamp ourselves,And on tomorrow bid them march away.Henry V Act 3, Scene 6, Page 7
So Shakespeare used "poor grammar and .... stupid."
It is perfectly normal to say "until tomorrow", "for tomorrow", "by tomorrow", "after tomorrow", so "on tomorrow" is not that much of a stretch.
E.g. or e.g. is at least twelve times more common in the book corpus used by Google. "Eg" or "EG" is sometimes an abbreviation for "electrogram", or "elliptical galaxy". For some reason, a few German texts are included in the Google books results, and these use "EG" to mean "Eingriff" and so forth. I have only sighted one valid example of "eg" being used to mean "for example" in this corpus. From all this I would conclude that "e.g." is the norm.
@Matthe WareIt sounds like a school test! To me either would be "correct"; in fact 'extensive assortment of diamonds' comes up about a dozen times as a phrase on google, but 'expensive...' does not, if that is a good criterion.
Forgot the reference:
©2019 CYCLE Interactive, LLC.All Rights Reserved.