Proofreading Service - Pain in the English
Proofreading Service - Pain in the English

Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

24-Hour Proofreading Service—We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files. We hate grammatical errors with passion. Learn More

Proofreading Service - Pain in the English
Proofreading Service - Pain in the English

Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

24-Hour Proofreading Service—We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files. We hate grammatical errors with passion. Learn More

Correct way to omit words?

In English, I know it’s perfectly correct/proper/formal to, for lack of a better word, ‘‘shorten’’ phrases and sentences in a certain way in some cases as in ‘Be that true, ...’ (= ‘If that is true, ...’), ‘if need be’ (= ‘if it is necessary’), ‘come what may’ (‘regardless of what may come/happen’) etc.

So, I’m wondering if similar rules apply to ‘Why be anonymous?’, ‘Why so excited/angry/etc?’ and ‘Why the question?’ as well as to ‘Haven’t you anything better to do?’ and ‘Have you any idea [...]?’, which I also hear a lot from seemingly formal English-speakers. Are they correct English?

Submit Your Comment

or fill in the name and email fields below:

Comments

I think there's a lot of different stuff going on here: some of your examples, for instance 'Come what may' and 'if need be' are simply idiomatic (check in a dictionary); others I find very dubious, for example 'Be that true' doesn't sound right to me at all.

I think we often use a kind of ellipsis with 'why', as in 'Why the long face?', although, again, I'm not very sure of the naturalness of your examples.

The last two concern 'have' as a main stative verb (e.g. for possession). Here we have a choice (at least in BrE) between the 'Do(n't) you have ...?' and 'Have(n't) you ...?' constructions, a choice we don't have, however, when 'have' is a main action verb, as in 'Did you have breakfast this morning?'

My information (Swan - Practical English Usage) is that the 'Have you ...?' construction is used more in BrE, although it is often seen as more formal.So even in the UK we're probably more likely to say: 'Do(n't) you have' or 'Have(n't) you got ...'. Having said that, your two 'have' examples sound just fine to me. Which gives us three possibilities.

Warsaw Will Nov-11-2011

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

Without getting into a debate as to whether or not "why" is a complete sentence, I would say that "Why the question?", etc., works as a shortened form, specifically because just plain "Why?" stands on its own.

As for "Have you any idea...", this isn't a shortened form at all. It isn't a shortened form of "Do you have any idea..." in English, you may often form a question by adding a preceding "Do", but in many cases, you may simply swap the subject and the verb. "You are..." becomes "Are you...?" "He will..." becomes "Will he...?" "I have..." becomes "Have I...?" This is the normal way we construct sentences, not some informal shortening.

porsche Nov-11-2011

1 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

Moreover, if ‘Haven't you anything better to do?’ when meaning ‘Have you not anything better do?’ is correct, then, following the same logic, isn’t ‘Hadn't you been there, they would have fallen through the ice’ also correct when meaning ‘Had you not been there, they would have fallen through the ice’?

sigurd Nov-12-2011

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

porche, referring to your last paragraph, does that mean ‘Had he breakfast this morning?’ is correct when meaning ‘Did he have breakfast this morning?’ I just want to be sure.

sigurd Nov-12-2011

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

Correction: ‘porsche’ with ‘s’.

sigurd Nov-12-2011

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

Warsaw Will: while I agree that "Be that true" does sound quite incorrect, what about the phrase "Be that as it may..." which I hear often?

Hacovo Nov-30-2011

1 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

If you are criticised for leaving words out in what is a well-known and commonly used expression, owing to its being ungrammatical (eg, lacking a subject or a verb), just say it's ellipsis. "Okay?" (= "Is that okay?"). That should put their gas on a peep for a while.
That is why commands or orders don't have subjects: "Stand up!" - who is standing up? It is understood, so left out.

In the examples of phrases using "be" mentioned above, surely we have instances of ellipsis and the employment of the subjunctive because we are talking of things which may or may not be. As in "Be that true", which suggests maybe it is, maybe it isn't. It is short (ellipsis) for "If that is true (and it may not be)".

Makes Japanese seem easy by comparison, doesn't it? [ 'It' is missing from the last sentence, so no subject because I assumed it: I used ellipsis. We all do. Often. Especially in conversational English. Look! There I go again.]

Brus Mar-16-2012

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

you is all rong

Lilswag and ampoo Dec-04-2014

1 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

Do you have a question? Submit your question here