Is English Your Second Language?
Want to make sure that there are no embarrassing errors in your job application, résumé, or marketing copy? Don’t want to sound awkward or strange? We can help you.
Upload your Microsoft Word (.docx) file here:
Or, share your Google Doc with email@example.com. Within seconds, you will receive a notification with our price, and a link to place your order.
Once we have received your order, we will edit your document within 24 hours. All our editors are American (mostly New Yorkers). We do not outsource overseas. Learn More »
Recently on Discussion Forum
I have searched the forum and not found any reference to this matter. More and more, I’m hearing this kind of construction: “The fact of the matter is is that we need to...” or “The biggest problem is is that we don’t have...” I’ve even heard President Obama use it. At first blush, it bothers me. There’s no need for the second “is,” and no grammatical precedent. That is to say, I don’t know what it might spill over from. Furthermore, it seems like a fairly recent arrival. What do you think? Is this something we should eschew or embrace? Has anyone else heard and taken note of this?
I was quite comfortable with the concept of direct and indirect speech that had been drummed into my head by a succession of teachers at the schools I attended in the 50s and 60s.
However the term “indirect speech”, like so many other facets of the English language, has now apparently undergone a change.
At least that is what one noted linguist would have us believe.
As in: the pie charts give information about the water used for residential, industrial and agricultural purposes ...
To me, “give” here sounds crude, as if the writer could not come up with the right verb; whereas “provide” sounds more appropriate, albeit just a bit high official.
So in an English exam I would have to mark the writer down? Am I correct in my thinking?