The use of SO in "the same manner or to the same extent as aforementioned; also"
so - Wiktionary gives these quotations:
“I can count backwards from one hundred.” “So can I.”
‘There’re another two.’ ‘So there are.’
Why is the first one inverted and the second one not? I read it somewhere that it is because the answer of the second quotation confirms the first sentence (aforementioned stuff), so it is not allowed to invert. First, I can’t find another source that corraborates this reasoning. Second, why is it not allowed to invert? There must be a specific reason for this subject–auxiliary inversion.
Submit Your Comment
©2024 CYCLE Interactive, LLC.
All Rights Reserved.
The discussion on the nuances of using "so" in different contexts is fascinating. It highlights the complexities of English grammar that often go unnoticed. Understanding these subtleties can enhance our communication skills significantly. For those looking to unwind while exploring more about language or gaming, there are some excellent options available for Australian players. You might find great bonuses and games tailored to your preferences, where you can find top 10 online casino at https://slotsmegacasino.com/en-au/top-10-online-casinos. Whether it's for relaxation or excitement, there's something for everyone in the online gaming world.
Riki104 Sep-22-2024
0 vote Permalink Report Abuse
amazing
Riki104 Sep-22-2024
0 vote Permalink Report Abuse
The word "so" is used in different senses in your examples. In the first, it is an anaphor relating the second speaker to the first. This usage requires inversion. In the second example, "so" is used to indicate agreement in the sense of "thus."
user111489 Jun-26-2022
1 vote Permalink Report Abuse