Proofreading Service - Pain in the English
Proofreading Service - Pain in the English

Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

24-Hour Proofreading Service—We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files. We hate grammatical errors with a passion. Learn More

Proofreading Service - Pain in the English
Proofreading Service - Pain in the English

Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

24-Hour Proofreading Service—We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files. We hate grammatical errors with a passion. Learn More

Infinitive without “to”

What is an infinitive without “to”?

He need not wait. or He needs not wait.

Can you explain more about this?

Submit Your Comment

or fill in the name and email fields below:

Comments

An infinitive without "to", also known as the bare infinitive, is used after modal auxiliary verbs (amongst others), for example:

"can do, will do, must do" etc

The verb "need" is a semi-modal, which means it can be used like a modal auxiliary verb or an ordinary verb:

"He need not wait." - modal with bare infinitive
"He doesn't need to wait." - normal verb with "to"-infinitive

The modal use "need" really only occurs in negatives an questions "Need I do it right now?", and normal verb use is probably becoming more common, and the modal use .

As far as I'm concerned "He needs not wait."is ungrammatical: it is neither modal nor normal verb use, but is trying to mix the two. At Oxford Online they say "he need not worry, not he needs not worry":

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/need (see Usage Note)

Warsaw Will Jun-15-2014

1 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

Is it ok to say HE NEED NOT WAI(T as the word, need, serves as an auxiliary??

gkwu8888 Jan-05-2011

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

"He needs not wait" does not seem right to me. I would say, "He does not need to wait."

Nigel1 Jun-21-2009

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

we call them modal verbs.

mykhailo May-24-2009

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

...except for "ought". Other auxiliaries are "can", "will", "should", "would", "might".

John4 May-22-2009

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

This is the use of "need" as an auxiliary, like "ought" or "must". Auxiliaries are followed by the plain form of the verb without "to".

John4 May-21-2009

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

Do you have a question? Submit your question here