you ‘had better not’ read it...
Why does ‘not’ in ‘you’d better not go there’ stands separately after ‘had better’ phrase but forms ‘hadn’t’ in the question:’Hadn’t you better go now?’ I see no logic here...
Unpacking English, Bit by Bit
A community for questioning, nitpicking, and debating the quirks and rules of the English language.
Perhaps there is some logic to it, but I'd have to sit down and think about it some more. Language isn't always logical, in any case; nor should it be.
Dave3 Aug-31-2004
0 vote Permalink Report Abuse
Maybe this lack of logic results from sb's mistake or not knowing proper grammar...
marta1 Sep-03-2004
0 vote Permalink Report Abuse
Ummm...maybe because one means "Don't go" and the other means "Go." Meaning - the two uses have nothing to do with each other.
Jessie1 Sep-16-2004
0 vote Permalink Report Abuse
Are you serious?
the reason the had and not are seperate is because they are meant to be.
Had better not - a threat saying that one should not do something if he does not want something to happen to him
Hadn't you - improper grammar "had not you" ????
I suppose it means you should
you should vs. you should not
two different meanings.
you tell me why the not is not next to the had.
:)
Ben2 Sep-18-2004
0 vote Permalink Report Abuse
Ben, if your best answer to a grammar question is essentially, "because that's the way it IS, dammit, and if you disagree, then up yours," then maybe you should reconsider posting.
speedwell2 Sep-19-2004
0 vote Permalink Report Abuse
Well in the first 'not' negates the action as in 'not going' 'not walking' while in the second is the negative form of a past tense event. 'To have had' or 'To not have'
I think 'shouldn't you go now?' would be more logical.
Bryan1 Sep-23-2004
0 vote Permalink Report Abuse