Life or Lives
Is it wrong to say, “The life of the people”? Or, do you have to say, “The lives of the people”? When you use “of” in this context do the numbers (pluralization) have to match between the first noun and the last noun?
Your Pain Is Our Pleasure
24-Hour Proofreading Service—We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files. We hate grammatical errors with a passion. Learn More
Your Pain Is Our Pleasure
24-Hour Proofreading Service—We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files. We hate grammatical errors with a passion. Learn More
Is it wrong to say, “The life of the people”? Or, do you have to say, “The lives of the people”? When you use “of” in this context do the numbers (pluralization) have to match between the first noun and the last noun?
"The life of the people" is the collective social life of the people, as in "The life of the Hopi is still largely communal," or "The life of the medieval peasant was a hard one." If you turn it around and say "medieval peasants had hard lives," it pretty much means the same thing.
tnh Mar-18-2003
0 vote Permalink Report Abuse
this one is complicated. It depends on whether you are using the plural or the collective sense of either word.
the volkswagon is the car of the people, the people's car.
It would also be correct to say "volkswagons are the cars of the people" but then it loses some of it's punch.
In the case of life or lives of the people, it depends on which way you are using people. Some english words are the same in the plural and singular. deer, for instance, also fish (though fishes is correct, as well).
"the life of the deer" can mean a specific deer or all deer, depending on context. "the lives of the deer" is also correct.
orig Nov-07-2002
0 vote Permalink Report Abuse