“it caught on fire”
In NZ I have often seen in print and heard people say “it caught on fire” instead of “it caught fire”. Is this a regional thing or does it occur elsewhere?
Unpacking English, Bit by Bit
A community for questioning, nitpicking, and debating the quirks and rules of the English language.
I've heard both in the US
SteglNutt Oct-17-2012
1 vote Permalink Report Abuse
I have heard both in the UK. But I am aware that caught fire/catch fire is standard English.
bloops Oct-19-2012
0 vote Permalink Report Abuse
While I've heard both in the US, I think "caught ON fire" is used most colloquially.
BTW, GO KIWIS! (I just LOVE NZ).
BlackEcho Oct-23-2012
0 vote Permalink Report Abuse
I've only heard the use of an unnecessary 'on' by americans, but like many things others are using it now.
It caught fire seems perfectly adequate. The only thing more jarring is 'gotten'.
user109384 Dec-16-2020
0 vote Permalink Report Abuse