Proofreading Service - Pain in the English
Proofreading Service - Pain in the English

Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

24-Hour Proofreading Service—We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files. We hate grammatical errors with passion. Learn More

Proofreading Service - Pain in the English
Proofreading Service - Pain in the English

Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

24-Hour Proofreading Service—We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files. We hate grammatical errors with passion. Learn More

“sources of” vs. “the source of”

Consider a scenario where a bloodstain was discovered and analyzed. It was determined the blood came from a single source. Joe is not the source of the blood. Jack is not the source of the blood. Which of the following statements is correct and why? Joe and Jack are excluded as SOURCES of the blood. Joe and Jack are excluded as THE SOURCE of the blood.

Submit Your Comment

or fill in the name and email fields below:

Comments

This is an easy one -- since they are looking for the source it should be singular, no?

z99 Jun-14-2010

2 votes   Permalink   Report Abuse

I agree with Zeenins. It's singular.

Amanda1 Jun-15-2010

2 votes   Permalink   Report Abuse

Excellent post thanks!

Sent from my iPhone 4G

motofreak1985 Jun-19-2010

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

Ok, imagine the blood they are looking for is called t-blood.

No t-blood has been found in Joe nor Jack. It is from the results of this analysis that Joe nor Jack are sources for the t-blood discrepancy amongst humans.

However, the focus of the search is on the one confirmed source, and so, Joe nor Jack are the source for this search.

I think I explained that bad, but both can be used, but they will slightly mean different things.

dbfreak Nov-17-2010

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

Do you have a question? Submit your question here