Proofreading Service - Pain in the English
Proofreading Service - Pain in the English

Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

24-Hour Proofreading Service—We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files. We hate grammatical errors with passion. Learn More

Proofreading Service - Pain in the English
Proofreading Service - Pain in the English

Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

24-Hour Proofreading Service—We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files. We hate grammatical errors with passion. Learn More

Word for Twitter Whores?

Is there a word to describe a Twitter user who follows everyone in an attempt to get them to follow him? Now, I’m getting a regular stream of them. When you look at their profiles, they have hundreds of followers. It’s just not possible or practical to read that many tweets every day. Obviously they are not reading anything; they just want you to read their tweets. It’s a marketing ploy.

Submit Your Comment

or fill in the name and email fields below:

Comments

I think you've answered your own question. The people you're describing are, in fact, twitter whores.

EGKG1 Jun-15-2009

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

How about Twitter Twats? Or Twatters?

cha_siu Jun-16-2009

1 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

@EGKG

You are right. I see that someone has already coined the term "Twitter whore" on Urban Dictionary, and the definition is exactly what I described.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Twitter%20Whore

Dyske Jun-16-2009

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

Twatters. That made me laugh out loud.

hadleyaw Jun-20-2009

1 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

I think the word is "bots," since the majority of accounts of this nature are controlled programatically via the Twitter API.

Rob2 Jun-21-2009

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

Twitter whores.
Please leave it at that, I'm already disgruntled by the fact that words such as "Google" and "Riffage" have made it into traditional dictionaries, they don't need to be filled out with any more uselessly coined internet terminology, especially ones that you have no need for.

drmc Jun-23-2009

1 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

I was going to say that something simple like "twats" would do fine, but I think Frank Luo's "twatters" would hold up much better out of context.

Dr. Mc, you're kidding! You don't find it cumbersome to say, "I searched up twatters on Google," instead of a much simpler, "I googled twatters"?

Tim3 Nov-19-2009

1 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

I agree with tim.heuett. New technology spawns new words, which is as it should be.

Tom in TX Nov-13-2011

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

Do you have a question? Submit your question here