Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files within 24 hours. We hate grammatical errors with passion. Learn More



Can one really work “under a time-constraint”? This seems odd to me. Since the person cannot literally be under this constraint. Would it make more sense to state, “ the context of a time-constraint”? Or is is better to state in some other way?

  • April 26, 2005
  • Posted by eggbert
  • Filed in Usage

Submit Your Comment



Sort by  OldestLatestRating

Constraints are placed upon things, so the thing itself falls under its constraints. In much the same way, people can be under oath or under guard.

The second sentence is a little over the top, and rather complicates matters.

Working within a deadline or to a schedule may work, depending on just what you're trying to say.

Persephone Imytholin April 27, 2005, 5:22am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

It doesn't matter if a person can literally be under any constraint. We don't take idiomatic phrases ("raining cats and dogs," "not my cup of tea," etc.) literally. Nor should we expect prepositional phrases to make any literal sense.

"To be under a constraint" can be interpreted as idiomatic, much like "to be under stress." There's no reason for either phrase to be literal.

clayton April 28, 2005, 10:25am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

under a time constraint, although you can't have one above you, works. it's just a different way of using the word under

Steve June 17, 2005, 2:03am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

You can't pick apart the logic of an expression requiring a certain preposition, unless you're talking about the physical world, all prepositions are arbitrary in the expressions they're used in.

Anonymous September 26, 2005, 10:14am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

Yes     No