Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files within 24 hours. We hate grammatical errors with passion. Learn More



How do pronouns function with a collective noun? Today I was in my College Prep class and we read a sentence that used the pronoun “they” after the word class. The sentence was “The teacher, who was angry, told the class to do whatever they wanted to.”

Would ‘it’ be a better pronoun than that and if not, why?

Submit Your Comment



Sort by  OldestLatestRating

"It" would indeed be better, because "class", while collective, is also singular (one class) non-gender. If it were "classes", "they" would be more appropriate.

Jay November 8, 2008, 7:18pm

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

This seems to be an example of synesis, also called notional agreement. The word "class" is singular, but takes plural agreement because it is perceived as plural (being composed of many people). This is recognized by many grammarians as a normal part of English.

In the UK it is more common for nouns like "team, government, faculty" to take plural agreement, and in North America it is more common for them to take singular agreement. But there is nothing wrong with either usage.

John November 9, 2008, 4:07am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

Jessica, these are collectives, analyzable as either a unit (singular) or as a collection of individuals (plural). Selection of singular or plural verb or pronoun has less to do with the subject being marked with plural {-(e)s} or not than it has to do with the sense of what's expressed. Try this:

The team has/have finally arrived!

If you're American, there's a good chance that your natural grammar will prefer 'has', singular, i.e. team as a unit (probably with all arriving at once, e.g. all transported by one bus). Then try this:

The team showered, dressed, and then it/they went to a dinner in honor of its/their coach.

Most Americans would probably select they/their, i.e. each individual showered, dressed, and went to the dinner (unspecified/irrelevant as to whether together in a bus or separately).

In some cases usage is so fossilized that what formally looks like a singular (no {-(e)s}) is an unmarked plural: cattle, police, people (but the otherwise equivalent 'gente' as singular in Italian, Portuguese, Spanish).

In some cases usage varies by variety language-internally, as John notes: US 'Ford is experiencing a drop in sales', UK 'Ford are experiencing a drop in sales'.

The answer to your question is "Do what comes naturally to you."

'The Beatles were...'

'The Stones were...'

But if not marked as plural:

'The Who was/were perceived by many as number three, behind the Beatles and the Stones.'

Your choice!

Potpourri November 9, 2008, 5:23am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

While "the class" is certainly singular, consider the intent. A situation is implied where the teacher is trying in vain to get the students in the class to do something. If you use "it" instead of "they", then you ignore the fact that each student is free to listen to the teacher or not. You require the class to act in unison in their disobedience, which does not make any sense at all. You also ignore the possibility that every student could be ignoring the teacher's advice, but still not necessarily doing the same thing. "Do what you want" addressed to a group usually means that each individual can do something different (unless, they're all voting on a single group activity).

If one wanted to be pedantic, I guess one could make a case that the sentence is weak and should be recast. You could eliminate the mismatched case and potential amgibuity by , say, changing "told the class..." to "told the students in the class..."

porsche November 10, 2008, 4:47am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

I think the sentence is grammatical fine but informal and more likely to be spoken than written because of its pronoun reference.

amancalledj November 11, 2008, 6:13am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

Make that "grammatically fine."

amancalledj November 11, 2008, 6:14am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

Porsche is exactly right on this one. It depends on the context. Also, be aware of your audience; you certainly do not want to imply that a collection of humans are sub-human by referring to them as "it." Maybe, it's just my in-the-classroom bias, but I'd be careful about that one.

I again agree with prosche that the sentence would be better if recast.

Why fix a problem when you can eliminate it?

English teacher November 11, 2008, 11:08am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

Thank you all very much for your help! I really appreciate it and I'll tell the class when the teacher returns.

Jessica J November 13, 2008, 10:13am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

I get a lot of students who use "they" as a pronoun for singular nouns in order to avoid the whole gender thing. That isn't the issue here, I know, but it is another example of the frequent confusion about noun-pronoun agreement that I see in too many papers.

I do appreciate the explanation above for collectives that are plural in Britain and singular in the US. I sometimes stumble on that.

Mark December 28, 2008, 7:02pm

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

Two choices:

All plural: The teacher told [the members of] the class to do whatever they want.

All singluar: The teacher told the class [as a whole] to do whatever it wants. (i.e. whatever the class as a group decides).

Without more context, one can't really say which is more correct.

Jay March 14, 2009, 2:08pm

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

I heard it speculated, perhaps in the Ken Burns documentary, The Civil War, that the divergence between the British use of "are" and the American use of "is" when referring to collective nouns was triggered by that war. The United States went from being a collective entity of individual states to being a single nation, at least in the minds of Northerners.

John C March 8, 2011, 8:18am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

Yes     No