Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files within 24 hours. We hate grammatical errors with passion. Learn More


What’s wrong with this?

Is the following phrase using correct grammar, why or why not? And how would you describe this phrase? It’s just weird to me:

“Hey, you’re that goofy kid Sandra makes do crazy stuff!!”

Basically Sandra makes this kid do goofy stuff and someone has spotted him, did they use correct grammar?

It just sounds weird to me, especially the “make do” part. Whether this is grammatically correct, what are the grammatical rules that would apply to a phrase like this? Thanks so much!

Submit Your Comment



Sort by  OldestLatestRating

"make" can be used with another verb as a causative, for instance
"I made him cut the grass."
If the object is topicalized then we end up with the second verb immediately following "make", but I don't see anything wrong with this.
I made him cut the grass.
He's the guy I made cut the grass.
I made him do the dishes.
He's the guy I made do the dishes.

John August 11, 2008, 9:01am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

"Hey, you're that goofy kid that Sandra forces to do crazy stuff!"

"Hey, you're that goofy kid Sandra gets to do crazy stuff!"

Anonymous August 15, 2008, 10:12am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

Is it more palatable as

"Hey, you're that goofy kid whom Sandra makes do crazy stuff!"


wkiri August 15, 2008, 12:12pm

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

I have to go with Anonymous.

There is a 'that' missing which puts it all into perspective. My guess is that this is not English, but American ("kinda like you know like what I mean LIKE") and the correct form of this sentence would be

"Hey, you're that goofy kid that Sandra makes do crazy stuff!!"

even though this is still not the greatest use of the language...

AnonymousTheSecond August 16, 2008, 11:06pm

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

Isn't this one of those "gardenpath" utterances?

AO August 20, 2008, 5:59pm

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

A garden path sentence is where you have to reparse. For instance
"The horse raced past the barn fell"
You interpret "raced" as the past tense of "race"... until you get to the last word, when you have to go back and reinterpret "raced" as a past participle.

"You're that goofy kid"... fine
"You're that goofy kid Sandra"... could be interpreted as "You're that goofy kid (named) Sandra"
"you're that goofy kid Sandra makes"... reparse as "You're that goofy kid (that) Sandra makes..."

John August 21, 2008, 4:35am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

Adding "that" might make the sentence clearer, but such a "that" is optional. The sentence is correct as is, albeit somewhat colorful. If it's ok (grammatically or logically) for someone to make someone else do something, then identifying that "someone" in the manner in question is ok.

I assume that "Sandra makes someone do something" doesn't bother you. "Sandra makes someone do crazy stuff" is also ok, right? "crazy stuff" is certainly colorful, but not ungrammatical. Sandra makes a goofy kid do crazy stuff" should also be ok, right? So you see the goofy kid and say: "Hey, you're that goofy kid!" (Which goofy kid?) "that goofy kid that Sandra makes do crazy stuff." Take away the optional "that" and you have the original sentence.

PS - it isn't really a garden path sentence. In order to misconstrue "Sandra" as the name of the goofy kid, there would have to be a comma before Sandra.

porsche August 23, 2008, 4:05am

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

The addition of 'that' is grammatically incorrect. The kid is the object of "Sandra makes...", so an object pronoun is needed, and since the kid is human, it should be 'whom'. That's how we get:

"Hey, you're that goofy kid whom Sandra makes do crazy stuff!"

(Oddly enough, the use of 'goofy' and 'crazy' cause the 'whom' to feel out of place, since they are rather informal and just about the only time anyone remembers to use 'whom' is in formal writing. However, this is the grammatically correct, if not stylistically consistent, version. :) )

Kiri August 23, 2008, 4:00pm

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

There is nothing ungrammatical about using "that" with a human. "Human" is not a grammatical case in English.

UIP December 27, 2008, 11:19am

1 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

Yes     No