As it were
I’ve heard people say “as it were” quite often. It doesn’t even sound wrong to me anymore. But shouldn’t it really be “as it WAS” instead, for proper subject verb agreement?
Your Pain Is Our Pleasure
24-Hour Proofreading Service—We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files. We hate grammatical errors with a passion. Learn More
Your Pain Is Our Pleasure
24-Hour Proofreading Service—We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files. We hate grammatical errors with a passion. Learn More
Agreed it's not a present counterfactual, but it's often listed as a subjunctive fixed expression, along with things like: be that as it may, come what may etc
http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/subjunctive
Warsaw Will Oct-16-2013
0 vote Permalink Report Abuse
I often hear it used parenthetically, as if it means "as it turns out", or "as it happens to be", which is is not present contrafactual subjunctive.
Example: "He came, five hours too late, as it were."
Markustenhaafus Oct-15-2013
1 vote Permalink Report Abuse
Yip dip lip pip chip, as it were, don't ya know, I said, so to speak.
jingen Aug-17-2011
1 vote Permalink Report Abuse
I wish I were an Oscar Meyer weiner.
Jeff1 Jul-25-2011
6 votes Permalink Report Abuse
In my own humble opinion, which could be wrong...
If you mean something like "so to speak," you use, "as it were". E.g. No rest for the wicked, as it were.
But if you mean like "something in the past", then you say "as it was". E.g. Life, as it was. or School life, as it was.
Cecil Apr-25-2011
4 votes Permalink Report Abuse
I say "an historic", but I don't pronounce the "h". "As it were" is subjunctive. If you knew grammar, though, you wouldn't ask such stupid questions.
Nick1 Dec-18-2010
1 vote Permalink Report Abuse
'an historic' is probably stilted if 'historic' is actually pronounced with [h]. And maybe even sometimes if it isn't.
Some speakers have it naturally, though, with [h]-deletion conditioned by stress.
If stress is on the first syllable, [h] is pronounced, and 'a' thus appears as the article:
a history book
If stress is not on the first syllable, [h] deletes, and 'an' is selected:
an {h}istoric occasion
an {h}istorical novel
Potpourri Nov-10-2008
3 votes Permalink Report Abuse
This one bothers me, too. I find the phrase "as it were" to almost always sound stilted, but then again, I am also bothered by "an historic".
jacka510 Sep-23-2008
1 vote Permalink Report Abuse
Drew and semiotek, I know it too. I'm used to "if", "though", "though" without "as", "wish", and even "as" itself leading the subjunctive.
David_Calman Sep-16-2008
1 vote Permalink Report Abuse
Long live the subjunctive! ;)
BeeTee-Ess Jun-17-2008
4 votes Permalink Report Abuse
The subjunctive is indeed incorporated into this expression. However, I'd suggest you treat this as a particular idiom along the lines of "so to speak."
JJMBallantyne May-01-2008
3 votes Permalink Report Abuse
This case is one of Subjunctive Mood. When you use the subjunctive, you are referring to something that factually is not the case – as in "wish."
(My non-technical answer.)
Elizabet May-01-2008
2 votes Permalink Report Abuse
"As" is a rare lead-in of the subjunctive. We are more used to the "if".
As though I were an authority on grammar, I post the above.
As it were, I suppose I could be.
lastronin Feb-18-2008
3 votes Permalink Report Abuse
This phrase is one of the cases where "were" is still required in the third person singular. In other counterfactual statements, we can use either "was" or "were", for instance
I wish I were/was going with you.
If I were/was stronger...
"were" is also required when it is inverted:
Were I stronger...
*Was I stronger...
And also when followed by another verb:
If I were to go...
?If I was to go...
John4 Dec-24-2007
6 votes Permalink Report Abuse
True. That is subjunctive. I not a native English speaker. I learn English such that I know grammar.. Subjective is one of the most difficult parts of English to many non-native students....
monkey Dec-20-2007
4 votes Permalink Report Abuse
Gosh - it'll be gerunds next!!
semiotek Dec-20-2007
3 votes Permalink Report Abuse
If I were a bit quicker off the mark, I'd have posted the same comment...
Mark2 Dec-20-2007
4 votes Permalink Report Abuse
Wonderful Drew - there are at least two of us who remember the subjunctive!
semiotek Dec-20-2007
8 votes Permalink Report Abuse
Isn't it the subjunctive? Isn't it saying proposing a condition contrary to fact?
Drew Dec-19-2007
10 votes Permalink Report Abuse