Proofreading Service - Pain in the English
Proofreading Service - Pain in the English

Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

24-Hour Proofreading Service—We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files. We hate grammatical errors with a passion. Learn More

Proofreading Service - Pain in the English
Proofreading Service - Pain in the English

Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

24-Hour Proofreading Service—We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files. We hate grammatical errors with a passion. Learn More

As it were

I’ve heard people say “as it were” quite often. It doesn’t even sound wrong to me anymore. But shouldn’t it really be “as it WAS” instead, for proper subject verb agreement?

Submit Your Comment

or fill in the name and email fields below:

Comments

Agreed it's not a present counterfactual, but it's often listed as a subjunctive fixed expression, along with things like: be that as it may, come what may etc

http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/subjunctive

Warsaw Will Oct-16-2013

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

I often hear it used parenthetically, as if it means "as it turns out", or "as it happens to be", which is is not present contrafactual subjunctive.
Example: "He came, five hours too late, as it were."

Markustenhaafus Oct-15-2013

1 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

Yip dip lip pip chip, as it were, don't ya know, I said, so to speak.

jingen Aug-17-2011

1 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

I wish I were an Oscar Meyer weiner.

Jeff1 Jul-25-2011

6 votes   Permalink   Report Abuse

In my own humble opinion, which could be wrong...

If you mean something like "so to speak," you use, "as it were". E.g. No rest for the wicked, as it were.

But if you mean like "something in the past", then you say "as it was". E.g. Life, as it was. or School life, as it was.

Cecil Apr-25-2011

4 votes   Permalink   Report Abuse

I say "an historic", but I don't pronounce the "h". "As it were" is subjunctive. If you knew grammar, though, you wouldn't ask such stupid questions.

Nick1 Dec-18-2010

1 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

'an historic' is probably stilted if 'historic' is actually pronounced with [h]. And maybe even sometimes if it isn't.

Some speakers have it naturally, though, with [h]-deletion conditioned by stress.

If stress is on the first syllable, [h] is pronounced, and 'a' thus appears as the article:

a history book

If stress is not on the first syllable, [h] deletes, and 'an' is selected:

an {h}istoric occasion
an {h}istorical novel

Potpourri Nov-10-2008

3 votes   Permalink   Report Abuse

This one bothers me, too. I find the phrase "as it were" to almost always sound stilted, but then again, I am also bothered by "an historic".

jacka510 Sep-23-2008

1 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

Drew and semiotek, I know it too. I'm used to "if", "though", "though" without "as", "wish", and even "as" itself leading the subjunctive.

David_Calman Sep-16-2008

1 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

Long live the subjunctive! ;)

BeeTee-Ess Jun-17-2008

4 votes   Permalink   Report Abuse

The subjunctive is indeed incorporated into this expression. However, I'd suggest you treat this as a particular idiom along the lines of "so to speak."

JJMBallantyne May-01-2008

3 votes   Permalink   Report Abuse

This case is one of Subjunctive Mood. When you use the subjunctive, you are referring to something that factually is not the case – as in "wish."

(My non-technical answer.)

Elizabet May-01-2008

2 votes   Permalink   Report Abuse

"As" is a rare lead-in of the subjunctive. We are more used to the "if".

As though I were an authority on grammar, I post the above.
As it were, I suppose I could be.

lastronin Feb-18-2008

3 votes   Permalink   Report Abuse

This phrase is one of the cases where "were" is still required in the third person singular. In other counterfactual statements, we can use either "was" or "were", for instance
I wish I were/was going with you.
If I were/was stronger...

"were" is also required when it is inverted:
Were I stronger...
*Was I stronger...

And also when followed by another verb:
If I were to go...
?If I was to go...

John4 Dec-24-2007

6 votes   Permalink   Report Abuse

True. That is subjunctive. I not a native English speaker. I learn English such that I know grammar.. Subjective is one of the most difficult parts of English to many non-native students....

monkey Dec-20-2007

4 votes   Permalink   Report Abuse

Gosh - it'll be gerunds next!!

semiotek Dec-20-2007

3 votes   Permalink   Report Abuse

If I were a bit quicker off the mark, I'd have posted the same comment...

Mark2 Dec-20-2007

4 votes   Permalink   Report Abuse

Wonderful Drew - there are at least two of us who remember the subjunctive!

semiotek Dec-20-2007

8 votes   Permalink   Report Abuse

Isn't it the subjunctive? Isn't it saying proposing a condition contrary to fact?

Drew Dec-19-2007

10 votes   Permalink   Report Abuse

Do you have a question? Submit your question here