Proofreading Service - Pain in the English
Proofreading Service - Pain in the EnglishProofreading Service - Pain in the English

Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

24-Hour Proofreading Service—We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files. We hate grammatical errors with passion. Learn More



The word “materialism” as used by the general public (as in Madonna’s “Material Girl”) is quite different from the one used by philosophers like Marx. I’m always surprised by how even highly educated people confuse the two. Communism is based on Marx’s materialist philosophy, yet the US is often described as a materialistic nation. This is confusing to many people.

Did the popular usage of “materialism” come out of the misuse/misunderstanding of the philosophical term? Or, does the popular usage have its own etymology/origin independent of the philosophical one? Or, was the philosophical one based on the popular usage?

Submit Your Comment

or fill in the name and email fields below:


Sort by  OldestLatestRating

I got this from the Online Etymology Dictionary:

Materialism is 1748 as a philosophy that nothing exists except matter (from Fr.); 1851 (in Hawthorne) as "a way of life based entirely on consumer goods."

Soup1 February 13, 2007 @ 1:45AM

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

Ask Marx's neighbors.

lastronin February 18, 2008 @ 2:25PM

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

Lots of words have different meanings or connotations in different contexts of usage. This is a normal feature of English and (I very much suspect) all natural languages.

That said, the meanings of "materialist" as applied to Marxist philosophy and American culture are not so very different. In both cases it means that only material things and material well-being are valued, and spiritual things are not. The connotations are different, however. Marxists, however, regard their materialism as a good thing (because they think the spiritual is unreal, and talk of spiritual values is just a trick used by the powerful to justify their power and privilege to themselves and to others), whereas people who use "materialist" to describe American (or other capitalist) culture usually mean to imply that it is a bad thing because it means that people recognize no "higher" values that might temper their greed and the ways in which they exploit one another in order to satisfy that greed. Of course, as far as Marx was concerned, the greed and exploitation was not a result of materialism as such, but of the capitalist economic system. A belief in spiritual values might take some of the edge off the nastiness inherent in capitalism, but, as he saw it, it would be better if people recognized that such values were a delusion, because this would help them to recognize the full horror of capitalism, and thus the need to change to a different sort of economic system.

Nigel1 May 4, 2009 @ 4:07AM

0 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse