Taking sides
It seems odd that you say, “take sides”. Wouldn’t it make more sense to say “take a side”? Why plural?
Search
Categories
Recently Discussed
- Idea Vs. Ideal
May 19, 2013, 5:32am - Heaven or heaven?
May 18, 2013, 9:54am - Pronunciation of indefinite article “a”
May 18, 2013, 7:50am - Do not induce vomiting
May 17, 2013, 12:18pm - “would of” instead of “would have” or “would’ve”
May 16, 2013, 12:46pm - Computer mouses or computer mice?
May 16, 2013, 11:51am - subconscious vs unconscious
May 15, 2013, 10:22am - “This is she” vs. “This is her”
May 14, 2013, 2:57pm - He was sat
May 14, 2013, 2:33pm - As wet as ?
May 14, 2013, 1:51pm
©2001-2013 CYCLE Interactive, LLC. All Rights Reserved. • About • Contact • RSS Posts • RSS Comments
erle
April 10, 2003, 8:22pm
Sorry, kortazone, "I'm taking sides with Kelly" is what most Americans would say--it's OK. However, "I'm siding with Kelly" eliminates the problem.
"I'm not ready to take sides on this." Also common, also correct.
The wages of sin is death.
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
joe
March 18, 2003, 11:55pm
I think Phil hit the nail on the head, while everyone else is missing the point.
It would be incorrect to say:
I'm taking sides with Kelly.
but correct to say
Everyone is taking sides except you, Fransbis.
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
lakefxdan
March 17, 2003, 11:45pm
The British use of "side" for what Americans call "team" explains this, I believe. Taking sides is the point at which players in a casual game choose teams. To Americans this sounds more like an abstraction, but it's actually a very concrete metaphor.
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
tnh
March 17, 2003, 9:49pm
"Taking sides" is the common phrase, I suspect because that way you don't have to count up sides, or determine anyone's specific position. You can simply observe that they've gotten to the point of taking sides.
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
jnealhicks
March 9, 2003, 9:14am
Taken in context, I think 'taking sides' usually refers to the point at which opinions, beliefs, etc. become sufficiently discreet and different so that the 'sides' or 'opposing views' can be taken or iterated. So, we might hear 'They've just begun discussing, and not yet 'taken sides' as to whether the policy was right or wrong.
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
sandiuck
February 12, 2003, 2:26pm
I don't think the point is in the object (i.e. the side), but rather the subject (i.e. that which takes a side). If one speaks to a singular subject, then it is "taking a side." However, when two or more subjects are present and being addressed, then it is considered "taking sides," though that, for one reason or another, presupposes that there must be at least one person on each - if only two - side.
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
purpledragon_13
February 5, 2003, 6:21am
If you were siding with one particular person, you would be "taking a side". But when people take opposite views, the act is called "taking sides". I believe it's to imply that there is more than one side, even though it is redundant. I think it has developed from slang, though. I believe the correct use is singular.
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse