Pain in the English offers proofreading services for short-form writing such as press releases, job applications, or marketing copy. 24 hour turnaround. Learn More
Joined: October 2, 2011
Comments posted: 2
Votes received: 5
Never mind whether one uses ordinal or cardinal numbers in dates. To my ears, "September 11th" sounds daft, implying as it does that there have been ten previous Septembers (cf. Henry VIII, Pope Benedict XVI). "11th September" is clearly an abbreviated form of "11th day of September" and thus makes more sense.
October 2, 2011, 8:00am
What I want to comment on is not the substitution of "that" for "who/whom" but the substitution of "that" for "which" in defining relative clauses, now distressingly common. I don't mind that usage changes over time, except when changes are being driven by ignorance, which is usually the case nowadays. <a href="http://dennishodgson.blogspot.com/2010/04/relat... link</a> expands on these points.
October 2, 2011, 4:29am
©2016 CYCLE Interactive, LLC.All Rights Reserved.