Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files within 24 hours. We hate grammatical errors with passion. Learn More



Joined: August 21, 2008  (email not validated)
Comments posted: 4
Votes received: 21

No user description provided.

Recent Comments

The below vs The following--The word, "below," properly functions only as a preposition or an adverb, neither of which can take the definite article, "the." However, the word, "following" can function as a noun or an adjective, both which can be combined correctly with "the."

Thus, the least invasive correction of the example you cited is: "The changes below will occur ..." Better yet is the phrase, "The following changes will occur ..."

Why do I maintain the latter phrase is better? Unlike the former, it handles the prospect that the text it introduces might appear on the next page or in the next column. Sequence is certain (following), but page orientation (below) often is not.

BitBlaster August 28, 2008, 11:53am

18 votes    Permalink    Report Abuse

"Some doubt that. Why invest in these sectors during a slumping economy, they ask?"

That construction would have obviated Porche's objection to an example I used in explaining that the terms "that" and "why" cannot be combine as immediately adjacent terms of a single sentence.

Adding that attributive phrase "they said," the relationship of the two sentences would have been made explicit.

BitBlaster August 23, 2008, 9:34am

1 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

Nomad your third post indicates a deft understanding of the phrase "doubt that."

However, the example sentence of your initial post ("Some people doubt that why ...") is not just weird, it is defective at the level of syntax rather grammar.

On that point, consider this simple modification:

Some doubt that. Why invest in these sectors during an economic slump?

The two sentences are correct in every respect, but when run together, as in the example, a problem arises. Why?

The terms, "that," a demonstrative term, a term that points something out, and "why," an interrogative term, a term that questions, logically cannot be combined without some intervening term--such is the clash between their functions.

BitBlaster August 22, 2008, 7:12am

1 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse

The problem with first sentence is its use of the word "why." The sentence would read more intelligibly:

"Some people may have doubts that investing ..."

However, the thought would be conveyed more effectively:

"Some people doubt that investing ..."

If required to use the noun form of the phrase in question, I would use a stronger verb than "have:"

"Some people harbor doubts that ..."
That is to say, some hold guarded or barely expressed doubts.

BitBlaster August 21, 2008, 3:50pm

1 vote    Permalink    Report Abuse