Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files within 24 hours. We hate grammatical errors with passion. Learn More



Joined: October 5, 2005  (email not validated)
Comments posted: 6
Votes received: 198

No user description provided.

Recent Comments

<<Computer companies usually avoid this problem by using the phrase "mouse devices" instead???>>

As brilliant as you think you are, I'm a tech writer who works with computer and software companies. Believe me, these companies use the phrase "mouse devices" to avoid the sticky plural argument.

whitneygallienNO October 11, 2005, 6:35am

14 votes    Permalink    Report Abuse

<< If mouse is an acronym for "manually-operated user-select equipment" and equipment is plural already, wouldn't mouse (as an acronym) be plural already? >>

Technically, yes. However, since few people know that "mouse" is an acronym, writing the plural form as "mouse" would simply confuse your audience.

<< Would this really matter since usually a computer only has one computer mouse? >>

Yes, it does matter. The fact that one computer has only one mouse is irrelevant. There are many computer mouse devices in existence. What if you wanted to write about the variety of mouse devices at Office Max? Or compose an inventory of computer equipment for a company?

whitneygallienNO October 6, 2005, 5:17am

40 votes    Permalink    Report Abuse

Ahem. That should be "manually-operated user-select equipMENT." Sorry!

whitneygallienNO October 5, 2005, 9:28am

32 votes    Permalink    Report Abuse

This is a tough one, because there really is no official ruling on this usage yet. Computer companies usually avoid this problem by using the phrase "mouse devices" instead. I would advise the same strategy if you mention the equipment in a formal paper, article, etc.

Since neither "mouses" nor "mice" is the official plural of "computer mouse," using either one is acceptable. Technically, since "mouse" is an acronym for "manually-operated user-select equipemtn," it sound probably be pluralized as "mouses." But since hardly anyone is aware of the word's etymology, and because it sounds less awkward, most people pluralize it as "mice."

whitneygallienNO October 5, 2005, 9:27am

96 votes    Permalink    Report Abuse

<i>With your reasoning, answering the question "Who won?" or "Who is the winner?" with "I." would imply "I did." or "I am." Therefore "I." is the shortest sentence.</i>

No, because "I" is simply a subject with no predicate. What David says is correct; in commands, there is an IMPLIED subject. If I told someone to run, I wouldn't necessarily say, "You run." I would just say, "Run," and the "you" (the subject) would be implicit. A subject can be implied in a command (mandate); a predicate cannot be implied.

whitneygallienNO October 5, 2005, 5:09am

13 votes    Permalink    Report Abuse

Inside the quotes. It doesn't matter that "hunker down and protect turf" is not, in itself, a complete sentence. American usage dictates that commas and periods ALWAYS go WITHIN closing quotation marks, except when a a parenthetical reference or citation immediately follows the quotation.

For the record, colons and semicolons go outside closing quotes; placement dashes, question marks, and exclamation points depends on whether or not the punctuation applies to the quotation itself (inside) or to the sentence as a whole (outside).

whitneygallienNO October 5, 2005, 5:03am

3 votes    Permalink    Report Abuse