Pain in the English
Pain in the English

Unpacking English, Bit by Bit

A community for questioning, nitpicking, and debating the quirks and rules of the English language.

Pain in the English
Pain in the English

Unpacking English, Bit by Bit

A community for questioning, nitpicking, and debating the quirks and rules of the English language.

Username

user109004

Member Since

July 9, 2020

Total number of comments

2

Total number of votes received

3

Bio

Latest Comments

mines

  • July 9, 2020, 5:50am

Maybe: "Mine is" when dealing with singular things because dealing with more than one you wouldn't respond "mine is" would you? if you were dealing with more than one the response would be "mine are". I guess "mine's" a better alternative rather than shorten another word for "mine are".

mines

  • July 9, 2020, 5:35am

I think the reason is partially due to laziness but I can understand how that word can come about. For example: (In conversation). John: I have a red 1990 Honda Civic. Dave: Really? I have one too, but mine's grey.
I guess you can say "mine's" short for "mine is". It's as confusing as Jimmy is supposedly short for James. Maybe if it was just Jim.