Warsaw Will

Joined: December 3, 2010

Number of comments posted: 1245

Number of votes received: 450

I'm a TEFL teacher working in Poland. I have a blog - Random Idea English - where I do some grammar stuff for advanced students and have the occasional rant against pedantry.

Questions Submitted

fewer / less

Natural as an adverb

tonne vs ton

Tell About

“reach out”

Recent Comments

Re: Plural of Yes  •  April 23, 2014, 2:15pm  •  0 vote

Well if Microsoft say so, it must be right (!). I think I will stick with Oxford, which gives me a choice. And my choice will continue to be 'yesses' for the reasons I've given above. Admittedly the o

Re: Have diphthongs gone for good?  •  April 22, 2014, 5:47am  •  0 vote

@HS - It seems that the pronunciation of both ligatures had changed to single vowel sounds in Latin before they reached English: In Latin, the combination denotes a diphthong, pronounced [oi̯], tha

Re: Have diphthongs gone for good?  •  April 22, 2014, 5:22am  •  0 vote

@HS - In the case of foetus, in the original Latin it was fetus, without a ligature. Presumably the addition of the ligature is down to a mistaken scholar. In the system used in the following definiti

Re: Have diphthongs gone for good?  •  April 21, 2014, 11:57am  •  0 vote

Interesting, that in British books, if Ngram is anything to go by, the æ and œ ligatures gave way to ae and oe diphthongs around 1820, well before the invention of the typewriter. This is the case

Re: Have diphthongs gone for good?  •  April 21, 2014, 11:30am  •  0 vote

@Chris B - my misunderstanding :)

Re: Have diphthongs gone for good?  •  April 21, 2014, 5:17am  •  1 vote

I missed these Ngrams off the last one as I was getting 'Invalid form registration' for some reason. http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=demon%2Cdaemon%2Cd%C3%A6mon&year_start=1800&year_en

Re: Have diphthongs gone for good?  •  April 21, 2014, 5:16am  •  0 vote

@Chris B - fair enough, but as you say, it is rather a subculture. As I understand, it the 'Dark Materials' series are children's books, and fantasy at that. I'm sure there are lots of words and spell

Re: Have diphthongs gone for good?  •  April 19, 2014, 9:28am  •  0 vote

@HS - It seems we can put quite a lot of these inconsistencies down to the Great Vowel Shift, the first stage of which involved two high vowels being diphthongised - /ɪ:/ as in tree started to be pron

Re: “it’s the put-er-on-er-er”  •  April 19, 2014, 3:45am  •  0 vote

@jayles - it's in the OED - so there's your answer. I notice these are all from 'up'. (well done,by the way, I hadn't thought of doubling the p in up), so how about with some other prepositions?

Re: Have diphthongs gone for good?  •  April 19, 2014, 3:38am  •  0 vote

@HS - I think you are investing me with more expertise than I possess. However, I think if I was creative, my answer might begin something lie this: I take it you already know Of tough and bough a

Re: On Tomorrow  •  April 18, 2014, 12:43pm  •  0 vote

As has been mentioned several times above, "on the morrow" is a very old expression, with the meaning the next day or the day, with nearly twenty instances in the King James Bible. It seems to have la

Re: “it’s the put-er-on-er-er”  •  April 18, 2014, 10:10am  •  0 vote

@Liverwort - Oh, ye of little faith! :) And here's the one for armor-putter-on-er, with multiple '-er's. - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsXZjZL5UrA I suggest we make a collection of these thingie

Re: “it’s the put-er-on-er-er”  •  April 17, 2014, 12:21pm  •  0 vote

There are a couple of videos at YouTube, both American - the pants-put-er-on-er, and the armor-put-er-on-er, and a few Google hits for taker-off-er. A single 'er' after the preposition makes some sens

Re: Have diphthongs gone for good?  •  April 17, 2014, 7:21am  •  0 vote

@HS - some of these spelling conventions seem to have arrived much later than the words. For example, Online Etymology suggests that it was in fact fetus, not foetus, in Latin. A well-known example is

Re: Which sound “normal” to you?  •  April 17, 2014, 6:43am  •  0 vote

@jayles :)

Re: Which sound “normal” to you?  •  April 16, 2014, 3:35pm  •  0 vote

@jayles - OK, I give you that, and I can see you might be right in making the connection to Old English. All I'd say is that I've never seen could and would described as being subjunctive in English i

Re: Which sound “normal” to you?  •  April 16, 2014, 4:49am  •  0 vote

@jayles - I'm sorry to harp on, but I simply don't accept they are subjunctive in polite phrases either; as I said, they equate to conditional mood in other languages, especially those that use subjun

Re: Have diphthongs gone for good?  •  April 16, 2014, 4:17am  •  0 vote

@jayles - I think it's a question of spelling. Fetus vs foetus rather than fœtus. Try doing a site search for fœtus the BBC or the Guardian and nearly all the results are for foetus. And remember that

Re: Social vs Societal  •  April 15, 2014, 6:30pm  •  0 vote

@Rocky - I talked simply about social change happening at a societal change as a way of trying to explain the use of the word societal (so yes, I was very concerned with the language point); I wasn't

Re: Mentee?  •  April 15, 2014, 1:58pm  •  0 vote

In a follow-up to the blog post in jayles' link, the writer, Glen J Player, seems to have given into 'the inevitable', and accepted mentee, because of its standing at Ngram. But he forgot to include p

Re: Social vs Societal  •  April 15, 2014, 1:42pm  •  0 vote

@Rocky - UKIP if you want to, but I think some of us would prefer to keep this a politics-free zone. I could just as well say that Brits have been indoctrinated against the EU by the likes of the Sun

Re: Have diphthongs gone for good?  •  April 15, 2014, 1:36pm  •  0 vote

I think there are two different things here: The first mainly affects British spelling - in faeces and foetus, the ligature (æ and œ) has a single vowel sound- 'ee' - /ɪ:/ in IPA; it's not pronoun

Re: Which sound “normal” to you?  •  April 15, 2014, 12:15pm  •  0 vote

@jayles -I think perhaps we're a little at cross-purposes. I was asking whether Headway said that C was the only correct answer, and that in other words A and D were wrong. I'm afraid I disagree t

Re: Which sound “normal” to you?  •  April 14, 2014, 12:14pm  •  0 vote

@jayles - I haven't checked it yet, but I'm still not clear: were they saying there was only one correct answer, or that one answer was incorrect. I still maintain that there is a difference in mea

Re: Mentee?  •  April 14, 2014, 11:41am  •  0 vote

@jayles- he has a great argument - somebody comes across a word they haven't seen before; they don't like it, or think that its construction doesn't follow a certain rule, so hey presto, 'it's not a w

Re: Mentee?  •  April 14, 2014, 5:26am  •  0 vote

@HS - Apprenticeship and mentoring are two totally different things. The former is a formal period of training, usually under a particular boss, who is responsible for that training, with usually some

Re: Natural as an adverb  •  April 14, 2014, 4:54am  •  0 vote

@HS - They don't sound right as Standard English, but the first one, at least, is quite normal in dialect, and of course there's the famous 'The boy done good'. Dialects have different rules, and in s

Re: Which sound “normal” to you?  •  April 14, 2014, 4:29am  •  0 vote

@jayles - well, it's definite that people don't use it, but it would have been nice to know why. I presume that's where your original question came from; I 'll have a look at it next time I'm in the o

Re: therefore, thus as conjunctions  •  April 13, 2014, 7:50am  •  0 vote

@ps.nikki - Jennifer showed the "formal correct" punctuation (I'll go with Jasper on that - when you're writing informally, you can do what you like), but it's necessary to know the difference between

Re: Pronunciation of indefinite article “a”  •  April 13, 2014, 7:11am  •  0 vote

@jayles - I bow to your greater knowledge of OE and ME, and I accept that a/an came from OE for one - you can see the same thing in many languages - Freench, German, Spanish etc. But I'm going to b

Re: Which sound “normal” to you?  •  April 13, 2014, 6:35am  •  0 vote

For me, A definitely expresses annoyance: I think we'd stress 'must'. D could go either way, depending on whether we stress 'have'. C is fairly neutral for me, simply asking about a fact. Although

Re: Mentee?  •  April 13, 2014, 6:15am  •  0 vote

Whether it's dreadful or not is a personal issue, and once I got used to it it sounded fine to me. Perhaps it's unnecessary, as my dictionary gives exactly the same definition for mentee and protég

Re: Pronunciation of indefinite article “a”  •  April 7, 2014, 12:45pm  •  0 vote

@jayles - Sorry, I regret parts of that last comment. It didn't come out the way I intended, and I certainly don't want to start WWIII with you. So, sorry again and please try an ignore my crassness.

Re: Pronunciation of indefinite article “a”  •  April 7, 2014, 5:09am  •  0 vote

@jayles - Language is never worth starting WWIII over, regardless of whether things were the same or not in OE or ME (I can't quite see the relevance of that comment, except to fly the Anglish flag) :

Re: Pronunciation of indefinite article “a”  •  April 6, 2014, 7:54am  •  0 vote

@Afzal - I think you'll find that Cooke's complaint about the use of /eɪ/ (AY) was when the unstressed form /ə/ (UH) was more appropriate, regarding it as an affectation. I'd be very surprised if he

Re: Pronunciation of indefinite article “a”  •  April 6, 2014, 5:54am  •  0 vote

That should, of course, have been 'idea ... comes from' and 'not even from Alistair Cooke'.

Re: Pronunciation of indefinite article “a”  •  April 6, 2014, 5:51am  •  0 vote

@Afzal - OK, I concede on Alistair Cooke's British birth; I made a mistake. I was a regular listener to Letter from America, however, and would maintain that he had gained a soft American accent, no

Re: “I’ve got” vs. “I have”  •  April 4, 2014, 8:56am  •  1 vote

@Moucon - I wonder what you mean exactly when you say 'I've got' is the subjective form. The term subjective usually applies only to pronouns (as in subjective case), and 'I' is subjective in both 'I

Re: Pronunciation of indefinite article “a”  •  April 4, 2014, 8:21am  •  0 vote

@Afzal - I'm intrigued as to just what nature of disaster occurs when I emphasise 'a' by pronouncing it as in 'say'. And although I might possibly use a stronger schwa instead, I can't imagine ever pr

Re: In actuality, actually  •  April 2, 2014, 2:21pm  •  3 votes

@durendal - you might want to check your grammar before throwing brickbats at other people. underink seems to have said it all, and I think this example sentence from Oxford Dictionaries Online sho

Re: Social vs Societal  •  April 1, 2014, 1:50pm  •  0 vote

@Rashad - I enjoyed your first reply - it certainly made me laugh a couple of times, and I admire your quiet restraint. In your second one, you're getting there (in my opinion), but I think government

Re: Social vs Societal  •  March 31, 2014, 3:51pm  •  3 votes

@Az - It is possible to constructively disagree with someone without insulting them, you know.

Re: Pronunciation Etiquette—Hypothetical Question  •  March 30, 2014, 6:31am  •  0 vote

Nepal - from Wikipedia - in English - ne-PAWL; in Nepali: नेपाल [neˈpal] (you can hear both at Wikipedia) - so it look like the Aussies are closer to the native pronunciation. I have to go with jay

Re: Pronunciation Etiquette—Hypothetical Question  •  March 29, 2014, 7:16pm  •  0 vote

@jayles - I don't think HS's remarks were so much about the 'Indian' as the 'Antipodean' commentator, as the examples of he gives of the 'Indian' commentator are all in fact standard British English,

Re: Pronunciation Etiquette—Hypothetical Question  •  March 29, 2014, 4:22pm  •  0 vote

My favourite dictionary (Oxford Advanced Learner's) defines 'politically correct' as: 'used to describe language or behaviour that deliberately tries to avoid offending particular groups of people'

Re: Pronunciation Etiquette—Hypothetical Question  •  March 28, 2014, 4:58pm  •  0 vote

As regards names, I think you should try and get as close as possible to the native language. It's ironic, but only now he's an ex-president are the British media getting Sarkosy's name right (i.e not

Re: What does “Curb your dog” mean?  •  March 23, 2014, 4:50am  •  0 vote

@Brus - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curb_%28road%29

Re: “I’m just saying”  •  March 22, 2014, 3:54pm  •  0 vote

@Skeeter Lewis - is that perhaps a polite expression for spam? :) I had thought of reporting it, but decided not to.

Re: Do’s and Don’t's  •  March 22, 2014, 2:26pm  •  0 vote

@Carl45 - Sorry to be the cause of your biggest pet peeve, but in this case those of us not bound by a style guide have a choice. As for using one rule in one word and not the other, it's partly to d

Re: A New Correlative Conjunction?  •  March 21, 2014, 8:25am  •  0 vote

@jayles and Jasper - many apologies - I got confused with all these formulae - I didn't take in that there were two of you at it.

Re: A New Correlative Conjunction?  •  March 20, 2014, 3:32pm  •  0 vote

@jayles - Sorry, but you've totally lost me. No, don't try and explain, I'm just no good at maths. But I do like language.

Re: A New Correlative Conjunction?  •  March 20, 2014, 5:34am  •  0 vote

@jayles - I don't use any of these, except for the original, but I'm afraid your stuff looks too much like mathematical formulae for me. As for question forms, I like good old-fashioned QASI or QA

Re: What does “Curb your dog” mean?  •  March 19, 2014, 2:30pm  •  0 vote

According to one source (link below) it all started in New York in the thirties, and that ‘Please Curb your Dog’ meant ‘Don’t let your dog do its business on the sidewalk. Let your dog do it in the ro

Re: A New Correlative Conjunction?  •  March 19, 2014, 1:50pm  •  0 vote

@jayles - sorry that should have been new info later. Can you confirm that in: SxMpp[OPT] - for "She had quickly walked her dog down the street the night before." x = Aux and pp = past participl

Re: A New Correlative Conjunction?  •  March 19, 2014, 3:55am  •  0 vote

@jayles - within the structure of SVO etc English also puts old info first and info later, which is why passive can be useful, as well as delaying constructions like 'there is/are'. We also like to p

Re: Proper use of st, nd, rd, and th — ordinal indicators  •  March 17, 2014, 7:40am  •  0 vote

This is quite interesting, especially the comments, from Ben Yagoda's blog - Not One Off Britishisms: http://britishisms.wordpress.com/2012/04/09/european-date-format/

Re: What does “Curb your dog” mean?  •  March 17, 2014, 6:08am  •  0 vote

@porsche - 'the modern world' - does that mean the modern world is restricted to North America? As far as I know, this expression is used nowhere else (for a starter we say 'kerb' in the UK, and so pr

Re: On Tomorrow  •  March 14, 2014, 6:50pm  •  0 vote

@jayles - the problem with that is that Monday can be used in all sorts of ways as a noun, not just in expressions such as I'll see you (on) Monday - using your formula, the results for British books

Re: What does “Curb your dog” mean?  •  March 14, 2014, 6:21pm  •  0 vote

Just to forestall any misunderstandings - kerb (BrE) = curb (AmE), so both Hairy Scot and Dyske are right on that one.

Re: “How is everything tasting?”  •  March 14, 2014, 6:15pm  •  0 vote

The best practice is, of course, to encourage waiting or any other serving staff to use their own language rather than a formulaic question, whatever the question is. John Cleese used to be involved i

Re: “You have two choices”  •  March 14, 2014, 6:05pm  •  0 vote

@HS - math is simply American for maths: Funnily enough the earliest examples of maths I can find are from the first volume of the American Educational Journal, dated 1864, where teachers advertise

Re: “You have two choices”  •  March 12, 2014, 3:42am  •  0 vote

@HS - I referred to PP as his comments are now labelled Hairy Scot, so I naturally assumed you were one and the same person; I'm sorry for your loss. As for 'yeah right' I think you're being a little

Re: “You have two choices”  •  March 11, 2014, 7:37pm  •  0 vote

@Hairy Scot - "just another damned Americanism sent to plague us" - yeah, right! "to seeke some other place of stay and refuge, the better of which two choices, did carry with it the appearance of

Re: What is the word for intentionally incorrect spelling?  •  March 11, 2014, 6:35pm  •  0 vote

@Peter Reynolds - Thanks.

Re: What does “Curb your dog” mean?  •  March 11, 2014, 6:33pm  •  0 vote

Just to add to what Hairy Scot and Brus have said, I would have said just the same as with curb anything else: curb your temper curb inflation curb the spread of the disease But as 'Curb your

Re: “admits to”  •  March 11, 2014, 6:23pm  •  0 vote

a British perspective: at the BBC (and other media seem to have similar results) admitted the charge - 140, to the charge - 3 admitted the charges - 120, to the charges - 3 admitted the offence

Re: A New Correlative Conjunction?  •  March 11, 2014, 5:46pm  •  0 vote

@jayles - do I not remember you advocating keeping technical stuff to a minimum? I had no idea what your SV[OPT] meant until I saw your explanation, and realised I had told a student the same this mor

Re: Pronouncing “str” like “shtr” as in “shtrong” “shtrange”  •  March 10, 2014, 7:27pm  •  1 vote

@Mrs Davenport - I agree with you that a lot of comments of the 'it really annoys me' variety do tend to be pointed at what seem to be aimed at expressions which come from one or other Afro-American d

Re: A New Correlative Conjunction?  •  March 10, 2014, 6:45pm  •  0 vote

@jayles - I think I'll just stick with subject-verb inversion - to complete your quote from Marit Westergaard at Tromsø: "Within traditional grammar, this is often called subject-verb inversion (e.

Re: A New Correlative Conjunction?  •  March 9, 2014, 1:13pm  •  0 vote

@Jasper - I've just noticed a difference between you two example sentences: I do not love her nor hate her. I have never hurt nor killed another person. The second one works for me as it has a

Re: A New Correlative Conjunction?  •  March 9, 2014, 12:40pm  •  0 vote

@Jasper, I wouldn't call that fronting but simple inversion, which is compulsory after 'nor', whereas fronting is always optional: She doesn't smoke, and nor do I. Look at your own examples, fo

Re: “You have two choices”  •  March 8, 2014, 3:07am  •  0 vote

@porsche - OK, I accept that we can use it idiomatically to mean no choice; here's one from the British National Corpus similar to yours - "Well he's got two choices, he can either eat them or starve

Re: “If I was” vs. “If I were”  •  March 6, 2014, 5:55am  •  0 vote

@Jasper - she's not against teaching grammar, but would prefer it through writing, not teaching a lot of (sometimes silly) rules before getting the students to write anything. And I think the author w

Re: “If I was” vs. “If I were”  •  March 5, 2014, 2:37pm  •  0 vote

@jayles - I quite agree with you about terminology, and in class I use the least possible, except where it can make life easier. It's a bit different on my blog, but people come to that from choice. T

Re: “If I was” vs. “If I were”  •  March 5, 2014, 3:16am  •  0 vote

@jayles - I'll have you know that the 'purist' English spoken in Britain is said to be that of Inverness, so I'm not sure why you pick out the Scots for special attention; try understanding a Geordie

Re: and so...  •  March 5, 2014, 3:08am  •  1 vote

@TheYellowRobot - I've realised that we can also have a result clause with just an auxiliary and no main verb, but in this case we couldn't invert the subject and auxiliary: 'John signed up for dan

Re: and so...  •  March 4, 2014, 5:05pm  •  0 vote

@TheYellowRobot - some people make silly typos, and so do I, apparently. Sorry for getting your name wrong, and Rider Haggard's, for that matter.

Re: and so...  •  March 4, 2014, 4:41pm  •  3 votes

@TheYellowRabbit - 'John loves to dance and so does Marie' sounds a lot better to me than 'John loves to dance, and Marie loves to dance.' which has unnecessary repetition and sounds unnatural (who wo

Re: apostrophe with expressions of distance or time  •  March 3, 2014, 5:15pm  •  0 vote

@jayles - Yes, I checked out Google Books for this occurring in 18th and 19th century books, and few books carried possessive apostrophes of any kind before the 19th century. The great irony, of cours

Re: “If I was” vs. “If I were”  •  March 1, 2014, 1:41am  •  0 vote

@sundy - we'll have to agree to differ. On a particular occasion like this where there is a real possibility of winning, we'd normally use what in EFL and ESL teaching we call First conditional, with

Re: “If I was” vs. “If I were”  •  February 28, 2014, 7:17pm  •  0 vote

@sundy - " Ideally, it would be perfect if we could create a subjunctive form of verb for every verb in English" - that would be to reverse history and go against what you were saying earlier. In fact

Re: “If I was” vs. “If I were”  •  February 28, 2014, 6:59pm  •  0 vote

@sundy - 'If I won the lottery, I'd buy a new house' with present meaning describes a hypothetical condition. But you're talking about a specific occasion, so If I hadn't had a chance to check my tick

Re: “If I was” vs. “If I were”  •  February 28, 2014, 6:35pm  •  0 vote

@sundy - I think you're confusing linguists and grammarians - grammar books written by linguists, for example the Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language (CGEL), by Quirk and Greenbaum, and the

Re: Pronouncing “str” like “shtr” as in “shtrong” “shtrange”  •  February 28, 2014, 2:52pm  •  1 vote

@Jasper - It's OK, I wasn't suggesting you were responsible for his views. The 'shtr' thing is way outside my experience (I don't think I've heard it on British radio, apart from Sir Sean), although y

Re: “If I was” vs. “If I were”  •  February 28, 2014, 2:36pm  •  0 vote

@sundy - OK, I follow your example now, but I think you're stretching it a bit far. In fact what I'd say in that context is something like: "If he really did act like that, I'd throw him out if he ca

Re: Social vs Societal  •  February 28, 2014, 2:13pm  •  1 vote

@Rashad - I'm going to play devil's advocate here. My dictionary defines societal as a technical term, and as I imagine that getting on for 99% of people aren't professional or academic social scienti

Re: Pronouncing “str” like “shtr” as in “shtrong” “shtrange”  •  February 27, 2014, 3:52pm  •  1 vote

@Jasper - A bit off topic, but I couldn't help noticing that the commenter at your first link refers to 'the effete pronunciation of "literally" as "litrally".' -which makes me effete, apparently. At

Re: take it on/off and put it on/off  •  February 27, 2014, 3:39pm  •  0 vote

@jayles - it's my theory that both Polish and German have phrasal verbs, and that German is a half-way house between Polish and English. Polish has sixteen prefixes based on prepositions which are

Re: Semicolon between sentences joined by a coordinating conjunction  •  February 27, 2014, 3:22pm  •  0 vote

@jayles - On Ngram, for 'for_CONJ' I'm getting 'no valid Ngrams to plot', although it's working for 'for_ADP' OK. From what I can see poking round in dictionaries, it tends to be found more in lite

Re: “If I was” vs. “If I were”  •  February 27, 2014, 3:02pm  •  0 vote

@sundy - of course you're right, which is why, in EFL, we refer to this as the Unreal past. We only have to compare it with any other verb - 'If he acted like that at my party, I'd throw him out' - th

Re: “This is she” vs. “This is her”  •  February 27, 2014, 2:53pm  •  0 vote

@Jasper - I don't think it's likely to spill over into Poland unless things get very nasty. The Polish people were very strong supporters of the Orange revolution, however, and have a strong affinity

Re: Pronouncing “str” like “shtr” as in “shtrong” “shtrange”  •  February 26, 2014, 2:37pm  •  6 votes

Perhaps they're Sean Connery fans.

Re: A New Correlative Conjunction?  •  February 26, 2014, 2:34pm  •  1 vote

I don't think there's anything new here. This is Oxford Online: used before the second or further of two or more alternatives (the first being introduced by a negative such as ‘neither’ or ‘not’) -

Re: take it on/off and put it on/off  •  February 26, 2014, 2:20pm  •  0 vote

Ah! Phrasal verbs! The foreign learner's delight. But you're talking about two types here - literal and metaphorical. The idea of putting on and taking off clothes is pretty literal - you put them on

Re: Semicolon between sentences joined by a coordinating conjunction  •  February 26, 2014, 7:31am  •  0 vote

@jayles: I don't think deprecated, necessarily, just seen as a bit old-fashioned. Oxford Online calls it 'literary' and OALD and Cambridge (learners' dictionaries) call it old-fashioned or litera

Re: Pronunciation of “often”  •  February 26, 2014, 7:21am  •  0 vote

@Peter Reynolds - unless they're going to publish different versions they have to adopt a standard of some sort, but I imagine nowadays it's a fairly soft version of RP. And not all differences follow

Re: Pronunciation of “often”  •  February 25, 2014, 4:45pm  •  0 vote

@Peter Reynolds - I would suggest that no accents or dialects are any more slovenly than any other (it's a typical mistake to call users of certain dialects lazy because they use non-standard verb for

Re: What is the word for intentionally incorrect spelling?  •  February 25, 2014, 4:19pm  •  0 vote

@Peter Reynolds - interesting - Google Books won't let me see that page - they say 'You have either reached a page that is unavailable or reached your viewing limit for this book'. I use Google Books

Re: “This is she” vs. “This is her”  •  February 25, 2014, 4:12pm  •  0 vote

@Jasper - I'll certainly echo Brus's last paragraph and Peter's last comment. We all have our sillier moments (especially me when I get goaded into defending the indefensible), and your comments are u

Re: “This is she” vs. “This is her”  •  February 24, 2014, 11:29am  •  0 vote

@Jasper - I really think you're making an interpretation I just don't see. Peter's 'offending' sentence was: 'The first time I heard "this is she" I thought the customer was being ironic because sh

  1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9