Proofreading Service - Pain in the English
Proofreading Service - Pain in the English

Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

24-Hour Proofreading Service—We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files. We hate grammatical errors with a passion. Learn More

Proofreading Service - Pain in the English
Proofreading Service - Pain in the English

Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

24-Hour Proofreading Service—We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files. We hate grammatical errors with a passion. Learn More

Titles in quotes

I’m writing for a trivia book that will use quote marks to signify a title. Would a correct possessive be:

How tall is “Sesame Street’s” Big Bird? or How tall is “Sesame Street”’s Big Bird?

Submit Your Comment

or fill in the name and email fields below:

Comments

It is "Sesame Street's" Big Bird, BUT, I would italicise sesame street instead of the quotes.

andrew.simone Mar-23-2006

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

Or, if it has to be quotation marks, recast to avoid the possessive: How tall is Big Bird of "Sesame Street"?

MCopyM Mar-24-2006

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

Since it's the title of the main body of work, it's proper to italicize Sesame Street. I would also take MCopyM's advice to heart and avoid possessives:

How tall is Big Bird from the TV show Sesame Street?

jkgrence Mar-25-2006

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

It should be "Sesame Street"'s Big Bird. (If the possessive was inside the double quotes it would mean the title of the show was "Sesame Street's". But titles of TV shows should be in italics anyway.

Owen_Richardson Mar-26-2006

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

You have no choice? Poor you. The second might technically be correct within the odd constraints imposed by the incorrect usage of the quotation marks, but it makes no sense, and correct usage must first and last convey information easily and accurately. I would have to do a double and triple take to figure it out.

-- Sean

Sean_Lotzz Mar-30-2006

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

I believe one underlines titles. The use of quotation marks is, strangely enough, for quotations. Titles are different to quotations. In this same vein, I'm rather sick of seeing quotation marks on menus.

Holly1 Mar-30-2006

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

Indeed, I'll have to add to the pile of suggestions to italicize. And just to point out, Holly, titles should not be underlined. Titles should only be underlined when they are handwritten, as it is problematic to italicize handwriting. Rules and conventions aside, philosophically speaking, using quotation marks doesn't do any harm. For more info, take a look at Gottlob Frege's 1892 paper entitled "Uber Sinn und Bedeutung" (On Sense and Reference).

AO Mar-30-2006

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

I agree, it should be italicised, not underlined. Although I do agree with Holly's point about random phrases in quotation marks. It's driving me insane..."Pizza's" plastered across the top of menus. Why?

Michelle_Mc May-03-2006

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

I agree with all and sundry that the titles of television shows, books, etc. should always be italicized (or underlined). However, although this answers this *specific* question, it still leaves open the *general* question, because titles of portions of a larger work (chapters, particular television episodes, papers in a journal, etc.) *do* go inside quotation marks.

ObPhilosophyGeek: AO--although the section in "On Sense and Reference" on quotation marks is very confusingly written (or, at least, confusingly translated in every translation I've seen)--I don't think Frege considers them inert. Frege here is actually discussing *three* different types of referential contexts (although for the majority of the paper he's only interested in two):

-Ordinary context, where a nominal refers to an object and has a separate sense (mode of presentation)
-Indirect context (such as in indirect quotation using "that"), where the nominal refers to what would usually be its sense, and
-Direct context (such as in direct quotation using quotation marks), where the nominal refers to *itself* (that is, the actual words).

Frege isn't very interested in direct context, generally, but this distinction is the only sense I've ever been able to make out of the passage...and it seems more or less accurate, anyway.

At any rate, this use of quotation marks is very different from the use to set off a title of a portion of a larger work.

Avrom May-03-2006

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

By the way, I've always thought that underlining replaces the preferable italicizing because of the limitations of typewriters (remember those?).

David5 Feb-17-2007

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

If I'm writing an essay and write the name of a television show should it be underlined or in quotations?

renae Mar-09-2007

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

Short stories and poems also go in quotation marks - not just quotes!!!

mary_jane_burner Sep-17-2007

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

So, how should it go?

"Title That Goes in Quotes"'s themes are interesting.
or
"Title That Goes in Quote's" themes are interesting.

Michael2 Aug-21-2008

0 vote   Permalink   Report Abuse

Do you have a question? Submit your question here