Submitted by manilavanilla on January 7, 2005

colonel

Since when does colo=ker. For the word ‘colonel’ we say “kernel,” but we don’t say “kerol” for the word ‘color.’ Its just a total disregard for any spelling rules whatsoever.

Comments

Sort by

ghoti

0 vote Vote!  •  Permalink  •  Report Abuse

lol degustibus. For the rest of us... if you did not understand deg's response, google "ghoti." You'll find some interesting thoughts on spelling in English also.

Manilavanilla, no existing word is completely a violation of spelling rules. It;s just that the rules are a bit more complex than you think. In the particular case of "colonel," the spelling is correct but the pronunciation is "incorrect." Mindbending, I know.

0 vote Vote!  •  Permalink  •  Report Abuse

I think it has to do with the British. All the french language influence and nobody knows what is going on.

0 vote Vote!  •  Permalink  •  Report Abuse

Exceptions are often made in English. i'm sure we all remember the old elementary school grammar rule, "i before e, except after C".
But there are plenty of exceptions to this rule "hence the C".

0 vote Vote!  •  Permalink  •  Report Abuse

http://www.randomhouse.com/wotd/index.pperl?dat...

It seems there were two forms of the word and we took the spelling of one and the pronunciation of the other.

0 vote Vote!  •  Permalink  •  Report Abuse

Oh and Taylor, I personally think the problem isn't with the exceptions, it's with the rules. In particular I think the ie, ei thing, like "colonel" has a lot to do with etymology and, if it were taught that way, would be a lot simpler. Depending on which language the word came from and how it was pronounced in that language, it is spelled a particular way.

0 vote Vote!  •  Permalink  •  Report Abuse

colonel = kernel,
so kernel of corn should be spelled colonel. ;)

0 vote Vote!  •  Permalink  •  Report Abuse

joachim, excellent link

0 vote Vote!  •  Permalink  •  Report Abuse

Your Comment