Pain in the English offers proofreading services for short-form writing such as press releases, job applications, or marketing copy. 24 hour turnaround. Learn More
“As if” and “as though”, does it mean the same thing? Is one more colloquial and the other more formal? How do you use them?
Somehow, I cannot imagine the American teenage girl responding to her friend, "As though!"
September 23, 2004, 5:03pm
"If" is more uncertain, as though you were talking about the possibility of something, rather than the actual existence of something."If I feel like it.""As if!" is a shorter version of: "As if that would happen!", "As if I would ever do that!", etc.
"Though" is definitely more of a certainty, because it usually is used when referring to something as it already is. "I was going to invite myself to dinner, though I suppose that would be quite rude.""I never figured him for a shy person, though now that you mention it, he does keep to himself quite a bit."
'Though' is also an unfortunate bastardization of "although" that is usually much more effective and less snobbish.
October 31, 2004, 2:22am
Dictionary of Problem Words & Expressions (Harry Shaw) says "as if" and "as though" are pretty much interchangeable. Years ago I read in an English usage book that "as if" is preferred for this reason: "She ran out of the house as (she WOULD run) if her hair was on fire" As though doesn't make sense this way. "...though her hair was on fire"? But her hair was not REALLY on fire. Nevertheless, one is used interchangeably with the other.
November 3, 2010, 5:17am
"Though" is not a bastardization of "although;" this is a common misconception. Originally, the word although was actually two separate words: all though. This phrase was used much like today's phrase "even though" is used -- as an intensifier for the conjunction "though." Although many purists will argue that "though" is an unacceptable substitution for the word although, it is obvious that history does not support this claim. Feel free to use though as a conjunction, but I would be leary of using it as an adverb, as many still take issue with that as well.
July 29, 2008, 11:01am
I think they mean the same thing. This British English page agrees (and I think most American English speakers would also agree):
I tried very hard to think of any cases in which I use the two differently, but after much wasted time I could not think of any.
August 30, 2004, 8:58am
thank's, that's a hell of a link you gave me here!
I have the same question for but vs. except.
"But for the names he called us, we didn't understand a tenth of what he bawled."vs. "Except for the names he called us, we didn't understand a tenth of what he bawled."
Is there a nuance of some sort?
August 31, 2004, 2:47am
Very slight, and not very meaningful.
"But for" many times indicates a circumstance that prevented the happening of something else:
"But for the the extensive flooding that washed out much of the spring planting, the farm would have shown a considerable profit that year."
"Except for" most often indicates something that is literally an exception:
"Except for the farm that sustained serious flooding damage, all the farms in the area showed a considerable profit that year."
In your case, the "except for" case is marginally more acceptable to me, though there is a great deal of overlap.
September 2, 2004, 9:03am
©2016 CYCLE Interactive, LLC.All Rights Reserved.