People(s)
Why is, in some of the English texts of the last century, the word, PEOPLE capitalized and written as PEOPLES? Just wonder when it became a single word without a plural form? I mean we write: “People are stupid.” But you can’t say today: “PeopleS are nice.” Right? Any idea?
porsche
January 29, 2008, 10:04am
Most of the previous posts are on the right track, but there's something that no one has explicitly stated.
The word "people" meaning more than one person, is a plural noun.
The word "people" meaning a group or society with a common culture, history, geography, ethnicity, etc. may actually be used as a singular noun. Thus, "peoples" would be the plural for more than one "people".
Examples:
"We are a people of honesty and integrity"
"Many peoples originally migrated from Africa during early human evolution"
See the usage note at www.dictionary.com
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dict...
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
krodamai (unregistered)
January 29, 2008, 7:23am
Peoples are peoples so why should it be you and I get along so awfully?
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
M Stevenson (unregistered)
April 11, 2004, 1:56am
Language evolution at work.
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
juan
March 5, 2004, 5:14pm
"People are stupid" is itself technically awkward, though we are used to hearing it. "People" is a collective term, while "persons" refers to individuals. So people are not stupid, persons are stupid.
However, Merriam-Webster acknowledges that "persons" is switched with "people." eg - "salepeople" instead of "salespersons."
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
Merriam-Webster (unregistered)
February 25, 2004, 9:25pm
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dict...
5 plural peoples : a body of persons that are united by a common culture, tradition, or sense of kinship, that typically have common language, institutions, and beliefs, and that often constitute a politically organized group
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
Jason (unregistered)
February 13, 2004, 11:46am
I agree with Speedwell. You use "people" when referring to one group of people, like the Chinese people. But, you use "peoples" when you are referring to more than one "people." For example: The Chineses and Mayan peoples built pyramids in ancient times.
Whereas, you would say: The Chinese people built pyramids in ancient times. And: The Mayan people built pyramids in ancient times.
It's like the word "fish." You can have many fish and many groups of fishes.
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
goossun
February 12, 2004, 12:34pm
It may clarify the question.
We never say "People is..." We always say "People are..."
Besides, many of dictionaries say "plural: people
". See Longman for example. Or check this out:
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dict...
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
speedwell2
February 10, 2004, 9:12am
Not that the Chinese were notable pyramid builders or anything :)
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
speedwell2
February 10, 2004, 9:11am
I hope I'm understanding your question properly.
After examining the dictionary entries for "people" (which usually also contain "peoples"), I conclude that the distinction is probably made to avoid the following sort of confusion:
Compare:
"Mayan and Chinese people built pyramids in ancient times."
"Mayan and Chinese peoples built pyramids in ancient times."
I can't imagine too many ancient people (individuals) who were both Mayan and Chinese, can you (distance being the obstacle to intermarriage that it is)? But I can easily imagine that there was a people (nation, society) that was Mayan, and another people that was Chinese, and that they were each pyramid builders.
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse