According to Fowler's English Usage, the verb that immediately follows "what" should always be singular. I may have misinterpreted it though (it was a 3-page explanation).
Now that I looked it up in the "Pocket" version of Fowler, which has a more conscise explanation, it appears that the latter is correct. It says that "what" can be plural.
Fowler's examples: Correct: What are required are faith and confidence, and willingness to work. Incorrect: What is required are faith and confidence, and willingness to work.
"These will not bring us happiness" or "these are not what will bring us happiness" would be my recommendations, since repeating 'are' when it can be avoided is rather clumsy sounding.
"Are going" is just a present-tense way of suggesting the future-tense, so 'are going' can generally be replaced with 'will.'
Dyske
November 10, 2002, 7:28pm
According to Fowler's English Usage, the verb that immediately follows "what" should always be singular. I may have misinterpreted it though (it was a 3-page explanation).
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
Dyske
November 11, 2002, 12:39pm
Now that I looked it up in the "Pocket" version of Fowler, which has a more conscise explanation, it appears that the latter is correct. It says that "what" can be plural.
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
Dyske
November 11, 2002, 12:49pm
Fowler's examples:
Correct:
What are required are faith and confidence, and willingness to work.
Incorrect:
What is required are faith and confidence, and willingness to work.
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse
yoinkmydanish
November 11, 2002, 5:03pm
"These will not bring us happiness" or "these are not what will bring us happiness" would be my recommendations, since repeating 'are' when it can be avoided is rather clumsy sounding.
"Are going" is just a present-tense way of suggesting the future-tense, so 'are going' can generally be replaced with 'will.'
0 vote Vote! • URL to this comment • Report Abuse