Pain in the English

Forum for the gray areas of the English language

Everybody vs. Everyone

January 22nd, 2007 by Susie

My mother and I were discussing the use of “everybody” and “everyone” at dinner this evening. Are these two words interchangeable? Is one more informal than the other? I have a B.A. in English, but oddly have never seen this topic, nor have I been asked about this. Any insight would be greatly appreciated!

  • email
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Furl
  • MySpace
  • Netvibes
  • Sphinn

23 Responses to “Everybody vs. Everyone”

  1. Chris L says:

    I seem to remember a long discussion about this that eventually came down to the notion that while some people "feel" some kind of difference in their own usage, the two terms are essentially synonymous.

    Then we got off on the difference between "everyone" and "every one" and that was that…

    Current score: 6
  2. alskdfj asldkjfsldk says:

    hey you i had the same question. we came to no answer. becauuse it is the way world of the universe. you know? i like totally understand your pain. i think that everyone is everything within ourselves and our human organs. when our organs join, you know they are in unison. everyone. everything. every where. every o n e. i just know this is the answer. just look into your heart and you will find that you yourself has the answer within yourself. within everyone within everybody. within every one. within every body. our bodies are key to the answer at krishna copy you will find the answer to the freakin universe. i have found it and so shall you.

    Current score: 1
  3. Dave Rattigan says:

    The only difference I've ever noticed is that (at least in British English) EVERYBODY is less formal than EVERYONE.

    Current score: 0
  4. JM says:

    I've always thought that "everyone" is best used when the crowd includes me, and "everybody" is more third person.

    But that could be completely incorrect.

    Current score: 3
  5. Guillermina says:

    From what I know 'everybody' tends to generalize, e.g., Hello everybody –you are not addressing to each person whereas if you use 'Hello everyone' each individual is being addressed.

    Current score: 5
  6. Vineet says:

    I agree with JM. You generally tend to use 'everyone' when addressing a group of people that includes you. 'Everybody' sounds appropriate when used in the third person.

    Current score: 0
  7. Betty Springer says:

    I always thought that "everybody" might refer to something involving action that a "body" would do and everyone might mean just an individual.

    Current score: 1
  8. Lucas says:

    I have been looking in to this and it seems that 'everybody' means the group whereas 'everyone' means each person in the group.

    Current score: 2
  9. mooncake says:

    The words everybody, and everyone are indefinite pronouns, and they are always singular. They should be used with his or her, but you could use "their" instead.
    Example 1: Everybody has his or her own problems. Example 2: Everybody has their own problems. To be grammatically correct you should use the singular pronouns, his, her, he, she. "Their" is more likely to be used, but is actually incorrect. Some other indefinate pronouns: one, anyone, someone, each, anybody, somebody, nobody, neither, and either.

    Current score: 0
  10. John says:

    "their" with singular antecedents is not incorrect. It has been a part of English for 500 years. If it's good enough for Shakespeare, Austen, Byron and Swift it's good enough for me.

    Current score: 0
  11. AO says:

    Everybody, everyone…excuse me but I think that anyone who claims to discern a meaningful difference between those two is (amazingly) more bored than I am. English has synonyms. Lots of them. It's ok, we don't need to be able to split small piece of a split hair.

    Current score: 2
  12. gri says:

    Lucas seems to have answered the question correctly, accurately, concisely and in fewer words as well. Thank you Lucas.

    Current score: 0
  13. chuckret says:

    I think that "everyone" seems more personal than "everybody"
    For instance, if you were addressing a group of people and trying to get a point across, you might point to a number of the audience and say "This applies to each and everyone of you". (It's redundant, but we say it that way).
    The other instance is addressing the same group of people and merely spreading out your arms and saying "This applies to everybody".
    I feel that the impact of your statement is lost on many of the people in the second instance.

    Current score: 2
  14. porsche says:

    Actually, Chuckret, when one says "each and every one of you", the words "every" and "one" are two separate words. It's not the word "everyone" at all. Think of it as "each one of you and every single one of you" If it were a single word "everyone" then the "…of you" wouldn't make any sense.

    Current score: 3
  15. Mario says:

    I'm surprise that nobody thougt to compare with FOREIGN languages yet. Many languages have a very clear distinction between the two words used to translate these two.
    In French for example (spoken not only in France, but also in Quebec, 1/2 of Belgium, 1/4 of Switzerland, 1/3 of Africa and many foreign territories and Island formerly attached to France… Guyana, Reunion, etc):

    everyone is translated by 'chacun'.
    everybody is translated by 'tous'.

    Tous is clearly 'all of you', while 'chacun is clearly each of you individually.

    I asked some kids in my apt. block, who are raised by a bilingual couple (EN and FR) and they confirmed they use these words aparts in English corresponding to the distinction they feel from the difference between the corresponding words in french.

    I think there is also a strong differences, in languages like hungarian, esperanto, and many others. Who can confirm ?

    Current score: 2
  16. chuck EEE says:

    Mario, that is incorrect. Chacun does not mean "everyone". It means "each one". French does not make the distinction you claim. Also, someone already posted that "everyone", one word, and "every one", two words, do not mean the same thing.

    Current score: 0
  17. Fábio says:

    Is it the same with "someone" and "somebody"? Is there any substantial difference between them? I've just remember Paul McCartney's song "Let'em in": "Someone's knocking at the door, somebody is ringing the bell". Did he use "someone" and then "somebody" just to balance and contrast the sounds?

    Current score: 0
  18. lastronin says:

    some-
    any-
    every-
    with -one or -body

    I believe it's a matter of style and personal preference.

    -one is used to speak of individuals, emphasizing a more abstract nature of the expression.
    -body is more poetic for the LOOK of the stem, where the d and y stick out (no pun intended). This I learned in poetry, which attempts to render visible the abstract or less sensated. -body is more sensorious (sensory related), referring to physicality.

    "Somebody's knock at the door." (I can hear: sense and human body physicality)
    "Someone's at the door. Please go open the door." (I intuit or suspect an entity and locality)

    Paul McCartney was on to something.

    Current score: 3
  19. taryn says:

    i have been wondering the same thing. I recently learned that everybody actualy means the hole group were as everyone means each and every individual. Everyone does not have to mean each induvidual IN THE GROUP though. Also, everybody is plural and everyone is singular. but it can be easily changed around. and really is no big deal to say everyone or everybody. but i do agree in most cases everyone sounds much better.

    Current score: 0
  20. porsche says:

    Taryn, "everybody" is not plural. It's "Everybody is going to the party", not "Everybody are going to the party", right?

    Current score: 1
  21. Chuck C says:

    AO, if it is irrelevant to you, why post.

    Oddly, my second Bible, The St. Martin's Handbook, doesn't address this. As for me, I use "everyone" when I'm thinking 'more familiar' [i.e. tu vs. vu] and everybody when the case is less so.

    Current score: 1
  22. Samson says:

    Lucas has answered the question correctly….read his comment ..i am sure it will help

    Current score: 0
  23. Douglas says:

    The distinction in meaning between “everybody” and “everyone” does not exist. Lucas’ answer would be correct for “everyone” versus “every one.” But AO was correct: “everyone” and “everybody” are synonyms. Fowler does not distinguish between them. Nor does Garner. who says:

    “Because the terms are interchangeable, euphony governs the choice in any given context.”

    Neither word is inherently more formal than the other. I have seen opinions elsewhere that one or the other is more formal—or more polite—but I have seen no real substantiation either way. I have found documentation that “everyone” is used more frequently than “everybody” in formal writing, but “everyone” is used more frequently overall, so I don’t see this as definitive.

    Current score: 1

Leave a Reply

Teaching English to Preschoolers with iPhones

Bitskis iPhone App

We (i.e. the creators of Pain in The English) developed a series of iPhone apps to teach preschool kids how to recognize letters and words. (My wife developed the characters and I did the coding.) Our own 4-year old daughter has been enjoying them. They are now available on Apple's App Store. You can search for "bitskis" on your iPhone, or visit the official website at bitskis.com.

If you have kids and own an iPhone, please check it out. It's $2.