<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is the word for intentionally incorrect spelling?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://painintheenglish.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://painintheenglish.com/?p=644</link>
	<description>Forum for the gray areas of the English language</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:26:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Name (supplied)</title>
		<link>http://painintheenglish.com/?p=644&#038;cpage=1#comment-10945</link>
		<dc:creator>Name (supplied)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://painintheenglish.com/?p=644#comment-10945</guid>
		<description>Well, to be fair, I&#039;d never heard of &quot;malapropism&quot; before.  I should also allow that Wikipedia, which was my source, isn&#039;t necessarily accurate.  I also usually look for alternative sources to see if they match up with Wikipedia.  I somehow missed doing that this time.
So, according to Wikipedia, the words must sound similar with no concern over whether it&#039;s intended.  Ian&#039;s example does sound similar, but that doesn&#039;t mean that all of he and his friend&#039;s replacements do.  He didn&#039;t state that they all do.
Having corrected my previous failure to examine other sources, it seems that it&#039;s common that they sound similar, not required.  It also does not seem to be required that it be intentional, especially considering the source of the word: &quot;Mrs. Malaprop.&quot;

In short, my bad.

However, in light of a more in-depth search, I have to disagree on the arbitrary replacement.  I would consider the above example of &quot;I&#039;m having a &#039;lamppost,&#039;&quot; rather than a &quot;coronary,&quot; to be a malapropism as well.&lt;p class=&quot;top-comments&quot;&gt;Current score: &lt;span class=&quot;top-comments-karma&quot; id=&quot;karma-10945&quot;&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, to be fair, I&#8217;d never heard of &#8220;malapropism&#8221; before.  I should also allow that Wikipedia, which was my source, isn&#8217;t necessarily accurate.  I also usually look for alternative sources to see if they match up with Wikipedia.  I somehow missed doing that this time.<br />
So, according to Wikipedia, the words must sound similar with no concern over whether it&#8217;s intended.  Ian&#8217;s example does sound similar, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that all of he and his friend&#8217;s replacements do.  He didn&#8217;t state that they all do.<br />
Having corrected my previous failure to examine other sources, it seems that it&#8217;s common that they sound similar, not required.  It also does not seem to be required that it be intentional, especially considering the source of the word: &#8220;Mrs. Malaprop.&#8221;</p>
<p>In short, my bad.</p>
<p>However, in light of a more in-depth search, I have to disagree on the arbitrary replacement.  I would consider the above example of &#8220;I&#8217;m having a &#8216;lamppost,&#8217;&#8221; rather than a &#8220;coronary,&#8221; to be a malapropism as well.
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-10945">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porsche</title>
		<link>http://painintheenglish.com/?p=644&#038;cpage=1#comment-10941</link>
		<dc:creator>porsche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://painintheenglish.com/?p=644#comment-10941</guid>
		<description>Actually, Name, a malapropism is a ridiculous, absurd, or humorous, misuse of a word.  It isn&#039;t necessarily similar in sound, but usually is.  As such, I would say it is exactly what Ian has described, except, of course, for the intentional part.  I&#039;m not sure what you&#039;re describing.  If the word replacement is purely arbitrary, say, “I think I’m having a lamppost.” instead of “I think I’m having a coronary.” then I guess it wouldn&#039;t be a malapropism.  It certainly wouldn&#039;t be funny or ridiculous.  It also wouldn&#039;t be what Ian was describing.  It would just be a pointless non sequitur.&lt;p class=&quot;top-comments&quot;&gt;Current score: &lt;span class=&quot;top-comments-karma&quot; id=&quot;karma-10941&quot;&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Name, a malapropism is a ridiculous, absurd, or humorous, misuse of a word.  It isn&#8217;t necessarily similar in sound, but usually is.  As such, I would say it is exactly what Ian has described, except, of course, for the intentional part.  I&#8217;m not sure what you&#8217;re describing.  If the word replacement is purely arbitrary, say, “I think I’m having a lamppost.” instead of “I think I’m having a coronary.” then I guess it wouldn&#8217;t be a malapropism.  It certainly wouldn&#8217;t be funny or ridiculous.  It also wouldn&#8217;t be what Ian was describing.  It would just be a pointless non sequitur.
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-10941">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name (supplied)</title>
		<link>http://painintheenglish.com/?p=644&#038;cpage=1#comment-10940</link>
		<dc:creator>Name (supplied)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://painintheenglish.com/?p=644#comment-10940</guid>
		<description>The only problem with using &quot;malapropism&quot; is that they must sound similar.  If all of Ian and his friend&#039;s words sound similar to the original, then the puzzle is solved.  If, however, the word replacement is arbitrary, then that won&#039;t do at all.&lt;p class=&quot;top-comments&quot;&gt;Current score: &lt;span class=&quot;top-comments-karma&quot; id=&quot;karma-10940&quot;&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem with using &#8220;malapropism&#8221; is that they must sound similar.  If all of Ian and his friend&#8217;s words sound similar to the original, then the puzzle is solved.  If, however, the word replacement is arbitrary, then that won&#8217;t do at all.
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-10940">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porsche</title>
		<link>http://painintheenglish.com/?p=644&#038;cpage=1#comment-10932</link>
		<dc:creator>porsche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://painintheenglish.com/?p=644#comment-10932</guid>
		<description>To Ian, what about &quot;malapropism&quot;?  It&#039;s not exactly what you are looking for, but it&#039;s close.  It describes the word misuse exactly, but does not require the misuse to be intentional.  Of course, you could just say, &quot;intentional malapropism&quot;.  I have a friend who does this both often and unintentionally.  My favorite was his description of a philanthropist as a philanderer.&lt;p class=&quot;top-comments&quot;&gt;Current score: &lt;span class=&quot;top-comments-karma&quot; id=&quot;karma-10932&quot;&gt;1&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Ian, what about &#8220;malapropism&#8221;?  It&#8217;s not exactly what you are looking for, but it&#8217;s close.  It describes the word misuse exactly, but does not require the misuse to be intentional.  Of course, you could just say, &#8220;intentional malapropism&#8221;.  I have a friend who does this both often and unintentionally.  My favorite was his description of a philanthropist as a philanderer.
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-10932">1</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://painintheenglish.com/?p=644&#038;cpage=1#comment-10930</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://painintheenglish.com/?p=644#comment-10930</guid>
		<description>I meant to say word&lt;p class=&quot;top-comments&quot;&gt;Current score: &lt;span class=&quot;top-comments-karma&quot; id=&quot;karma-10930&quot;&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to say word
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-10930">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://painintheenglish.com/?p=644&#038;cpage=1#comment-10929</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://painintheenglish.com/?p=644#comment-10929</guid>
		<description>METAPLASMUS I think this is the work you are all looking for :) Hope this helps&lt;p class=&quot;top-comments&quot;&gt;Current score: &lt;span class=&quot;top-comments-karma&quot; id=&quot;karma-10929&quot;&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>METAPLASMUS I think this is the work you are all looking for :) Hope this helps
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-10929">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name (supplied)</title>
		<link>http://painintheenglish.com/?p=644&#038;cpage=1#comment-10917</link>
		<dc:creator>Name (supplied)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://painintheenglish.com/?p=644#comment-10917</guid>
		<description>Ian, I don&#039;t think there&#039;s a word for that, but I would call it a &quot;misnym.&quot;&lt;p class=&quot;top-comments&quot;&gt;Current score: &lt;span class=&quot;top-comments-karma&quot; id=&quot;karma-10917&quot;&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian, I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a word for that, but I would call it a &#8220;misnym.&#8221;
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-10917">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://painintheenglish.com/?p=644&#038;cpage=1#comment-10916</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://painintheenglish.com/?p=644#comment-10916</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.  This is all very interesting to me, but I am looking for the word for intentional misuse of a word, not intentional misspelling.  Can anyone help me?  My example would be from when my friend and I would be surprised by something, one of us would say, &quot;I think I&#039;m having a cataract,&quot; instead of &quot;I think I&#039;m having a cardiac [arrest]&quot; or &quot;I think I&#039;m having a coronary.&quot;  We got started with our &quot;mis-phrase&quot; years ago, and I only now am wondering what this linguistic occurrence is.
Thanks!&lt;p class=&quot;top-comments&quot;&gt;Current score: &lt;span class=&quot;top-comments-karma&quot; id=&quot;karma-10916&quot;&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.  This is all very interesting to me, but I am looking for the word for intentional misuse of a word, not intentional misspelling.  Can anyone help me?  My example would be from when my friend and I would be surprised by something, one of us would say, &#8220;I think I&#8217;m having a cataract,&#8221; instead of &#8220;I think I&#8217;m having a cardiac [arrest]&#8221; or &#8220;I think I&#8217;m having a coronary.&#8221;  We got started with our &#8220;mis-phrase&#8221; years ago, and I only now am wondering what this linguistic occurrence is.<br />
Thanks!
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-10916">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://painintheenglish.com/?p=644&#038;cpage=1#comment-10819</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://painintheenglish.com/?p=644#comment-10819</guid>
		<description>A friend sent me the link to this interesting site when I recently posed the same question myself.  Having read the discussion and considered the various suggestions, how about &quot;SPERV&quot;?  Being a diminutive of &quot;spelling perversion&quot;?&lt;p class=&quot;top-comments&quot;&gt;Current score: &lt;span class=&quot;top-comments-karma&quot; id=&quot;karma-10819&quot;&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend sent me the link to this interesting site when I recently posed the same question myself.  Having read the discussion and considered the various suggestions, how about &#8220;SPERV&#8221;?  Being a diminutive of &#8220;spelling perversion&#8221;?
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-10819">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cici</title>
		<link>http://painintheenglish.com/?p=644&#038;cpage=1#comment-10572</link>
		<dc:creator>cici</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://painintheenglish.com/?p=644#comment-10572</guid>
		<description>is the answer purposely?&lt;p class=&quot;top-comments&quot;&gt;Current score: &lt;span class=&quot;top-comments-karma&quot; id=&quot;karma-10572&quot;&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;small&gt;(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is the answer purposely?
<p class="top-comments">Current score: <span class="top-comments-karma" id="karma-10572">0</span> <small>(to vote for this comment, please visit the site)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
