<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pain in the English &#187; Book Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://painintheenglish.com/?feed=rss2&#038;cat=10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://painintheenglish.com</link>
	<description>Forum for the gray areas of the English language</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:47:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Feeling concern</title>
		<link>http://painintheenglish.com/?p=923</link>
		<comments>http://painintheenglish.com/?p=923#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dyske</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://painintheenglish.com/?p=923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several people I know felt that this use of &#8220;concern&#8221; was correct:
&#8220;She felt concern, but not enough to sacrifice&#8230;&#8221;
I felt that it should be &#8220;concerned&#8221;. Two of them are professional writers, so I can&#8217;t argue much, but if &#8220;concern&#8221; is also correct, what is its function? Noun or adjective? If it&#8217;s a noun, shouldn&#8217;t it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several people I know felt that this use of &ldquo;concern&rdquo; was correct:<br />
&ldquo;She felt concern, but not enough to sacrifice&#8230;&rdquo;<br />
I felt that it should be &ldquo;concerned&rdquo;. Two of them are professional writers, so I can&rsquo;t argue much, but if &ldquo;concern&rdquo; is also correct, what is its function? Noun or adjective? If it&rsquo;s a noun, shouldn&rsquo;t it be &ldquo;a concern&rdquo;? If it&rsquo;s an adjective, shouldn&rsquo;t it be &ldquo;concerned&rdquo;? In dictionaries, &ldquo;concern&rdquo; is either a noun or a verb, not an adjective.</p>
<p>Oddly enough, the same people felt that &ldquo;She felt scare&rdquo; was clearly wrong. If &ldquo;scare&rdquo; is wrong and &ldquo;scared&rdquo; is correct, then shouldn&rsquo;t the same hold true for &ldquo;concern&rdquo; and &ldquo;concerned&rdquo;?</p>
<p>On the web, I do see many people using &ldquo;feel concern&rdquo; although it is slightly less common than &ldquo;feel concerned&rdquo;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://painintheenglish.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=923</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Official Dictionary of Unofficial English&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://painintheenglish.com/?p=844</link>
		<comments>http://painintheenglish.com/?p=844#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 09:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dyske</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://painintheenglish.com/?p=844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For some unknown reason, I&#8217;ve always aspired to coining a word to be used by millions. That dream came true when the term &#8220;muffin-top&#8221; was picked up by Daily News, and consequently by William Safire in New York Times where he even mentioned my name. Since then, several people came out and claimed that they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some unknown reason, I&rsquo;ve always aspired to coining a word to be used by millions. That dream came true when the term &ldquo;muffin-top&rdquo; was picked up by Daily News, and consequently by William Safire in New York Times where he even mentioned my name. Since then, several people came out and claimed that they invented that term, but none of them have the proof that I have, which is my entry to pseudodictionary.com dated May 2003.</p>
<p>The Internet has changed the way language spreads and evolves. It also changed the way we keep track of that evolution. A new book by Grant Barret entitled, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0071458042" target="_blank">&ldquo;The Official Dictionary of Unofficial English&rdquo;</a> is a great example of that. By using the technologies available on the Internet, he devised a way to record new words and word usages. It is a printed version of his site <a href="http://www.doubletongued.org" target="_blank">doubletongued.org</a>. By reading the chronological citations for each word, you get a sense of how it spread and evolved. As amusing as some of these words are, studying of this process of evolution goes far beyond mere entertainment. I think it&rsquo;s a great contribution to the modern lexicology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://painintheenglish.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=844</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
